Consistent tutorial language#444
Closed
haampie wants to merge 5 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Replaced instances of "let's do ...", "we will ...", and "the packager can ..." with "you will ..." or passive voice equivalents across the following tutorial files: - tutorial_advanced_packaging.rst - tutorial_basics.rst - tutorial_binary_cache.rst - tutorial_buildsystems.rst This change improves the consistency and clarity of the tutorial documentation.
I replaced instances of "you will", "you can", "you are", "you should", "your", and "let's" with "we will", "we can", "we are", "we should", "our", and "let us" respectively in the following files: - tutorial_packaging.rst - tutorial_scripting.rst - tutorial_stacks.rst This change makes the language more consistent throughout the tutorials.
I replaced instances of "you will", "you can", "you are", "you should", "your", and "let's" with "we will", "we can", "we are", "we should", "our", and "let us" respectively in the following files: - tutorial_packaging.rst - tutorial_scripting.rst - tutorial_stacks.rst This change makes the language more consistent throughout the tutorials.
I've updated the following tutorial files to use consistent language: - tutorial_configuration.rst - tutorial_developer_workflows.rst - tutorial_environments.rst - tutorial_modules.rst Changes include: - Replaced "you will" with "we will" - Replaced "you can" with "we can" - Replaced "your" with "our" (contextually) - Replaced "yourself" with "ourselves" - Replaced "the packager can" with "we can" - Ensured "let's" and its variants align with the "we will" tone. These changes should improve the readability and consistency of your tutorial documentation.
I've updated the language in the following tutorial files to use "we will..." and "let's..." consistently, replacing variations like "you will...", "the packager can...", etc.: - tutorial_advanced_packaging.rst - tutorial_basics.rst - tutorial_binary_cache.rst - tutorial_buildsystems.rst This change improves the readability and consistency of the tutorials.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
we not you
edit: this is a caricature