Add MatrixMeshtasticRelay#4840
Conversation
9309467 to
80463c5
Compare
4ff224c to
55d62c1
Compare
578707e to
d87f6d5
Compare
|
It'd be better if this role is made part of the playbook ( Would you be open to reworking this PR, so that it includes the full role here? |
|
@spantaleev Of course. Since more playbooks have been moved to other repositories, I thought this would be the right approach. |
Vendors the meshtastic-matrix-relay (mmrelay) role into roles/custom/ following the conventions used by other bridge roles. Co-authored-by: luschmar <90399580+luschmar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: luschmar <90399580+luschmar@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks for the initial PR, @luschmar! 🙏 Reworked this into a fully vendored role at Key user-facing changes vs. your original galaxy role (worth noting if you're tracking it elsewhere):
Container hardening also got a small bump: Docs live at |
|
Heads-up @luschmar: upstream shipped v1.3.x in the meantime, and the Renovate bump PR made me realize the role needs more than a version tag change. v1.3.0 introduced a unified Pushed to master as 8e2545a. In summary, I bumped the version to 1.3.5 and rearranged the container mounts:
Still completely untested on my end, same caveat as before: if anything looks wrong, a follow-up PR is very welcome. |
|
Thank you very much! I will migrate this as soon as possible and share my feedback. Please be patient, as I might need a bit more time. |
I want to add Meshtastic to the deployment. For that I created a galaxy Role https://github.com/luschmar/ansible-role-mmrelay