Add ai agent v2#1257
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ElyasRashno <42498039+ElyasRashno@users.noreply.github.com>
| @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | |||
| SPDX-License-Identifier: Community-Spec-1.0 | |||
|
|
|||
| # AutomationLevel | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is already merged to Core as IsoAutomationLevel. ("ISO" prefix is added per suggestion from Max during review in Tech call)
See https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/develop/model/Core/Vocabularies/IsoAutomationLevel.md
|
|
||
| - name: agentProtocol | ||
| - Nature: ObjectProperty | ||
| - Range: /Core/DictionaryEntry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using /Core/ExternalIdentiferType may be more suitable here?
Then we can specify all protocols in that type. SBOM producers will pick the standardized names.
The downside of doing that is, the list is fixed, if the protocol is not in the list, the SBOM producer has to pick "other".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove this in favor of the existing /Core/IsoAutomationLevel
| determine the scope of resources an agent may be permitted to access and the | ||
| types of operations it may be authorized to execute. | ||
|
|
||
| This enumeration is informed by the NIST AI Agent Standards Initiative trust |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we have link for this?
See example https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/develop/model/Core/Vocabularies/IsoAutomationLevel.md?plain=1
2 participants
ai agent proposal #1256