6l: fix datblk loop in asmb_elf: sizeof(buf) not sizeof(buf.dbuf)#141
Merged
Conversation
buf.dbuf is char[1], so sizeof(buf.dbuf)=1. With Dbufslop=100 the step was 1-100=-99, which got passed as the write count to pwrite, causing "bad address in syscall". The correct size is sizeof(buf) (the full union), matching the existing asmb() data loop. https://claude.ai/code/session_01WGAwvvTwDg2yknFkmZ3qzs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
buf.dbuf is char[1], so sizeof(buf.dbuf)=1. With Dbufslop=100 the step was 1-100=-99, which got passed as the write count to pwrite, causing "bad address in syscall". The correct size is sizeof(buf) (the full union), matching the existing asmb() data loop.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01WGAwvvTwDg2yknFkmZ3qzs