fix: commentWithDev option apply template

[btea]

No description provided.

[btea]

When I added the commentWithDev option to the unocss repository, I saw that they were using template mode, and then I realized that the template content did not respect the commentWithDev option. 😄

[AmirSa12]

When I added the commentWithDev option to the unocss repository, I saw that they were using template mode, and then I realized that the template content did not respect the commentWithDev option. 😄

Thanks for taking care of it. anything else you want to tweak in this PR?

[btea]

I've been thinking about this. Should the commands in the template file respect the packageManager options? If multiple values ​​are passed, should I add multiple installation commands to the README file?

[AmirSa12]

I've been thinking about this. Should the commands in the template file respect the packageManager options? If multiple values ​​are passed, should I add multiple installation commands to the README file?

I think the UX should be consistent, so yeah. what do you think?

[btea]

However, the templates on the stackbltiz website are installed using npm by default, so keeping it as it is is sufficient.

Of course, generating multiple installation links in the readme doesn't seem to have any impact.