docs(math/base/special/croundn): fix incorrect return annotation in C example

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

Author: officiallyanee

lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/croundn/src/main.c

@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@
 * stdlib_complex128_t out = stdlib_base_croundn( z, -2 );
 *
 * double re = stdlib_complex128_real( out );
-* // returns 3.14
+* // returns -3.14
 *
 * double im = stdlib_complex128_imag( out );
-* // returns -3.14
+* // returns 3.14
 */
 stdlib_complex128_t stdlib_base_croundn( const stdlib_complex128_t z, const int32_t n ) {
 	double re;