chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #9867)#10035
chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #9867)#10035NitinDarker wants to merge 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
Conversation
Replace new Array() constructor with array literal and use push() method to comply with no-new-array ESLint rule. Closes stdlib-js#9867 --- --- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: na - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: na - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: na - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---
|
Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib. We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:
This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:
We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution! |
|
👋 Hi there! 👋 And thank you for opening your first pull request! We will review it shortly. 🏃 💨 Getting Started
Next Steps
Running Tests LocallyYou can use # Run tests for all packages in the math namespace:
make test TESTS_FILTER=".*/@stdlib/math/.*"
# Run benchmarks for a specific package:
make benchmark BENCHMARKS_FILTER=".*/@stdlib/math/base/special/sin/.*"If you haven't heard back from us within two weeks, please ping us by tagging the "reviewers" team in a comment on this PR. If you have any further questions while waiting for a response, please join our Zulip community to chat with project maintainers and other community members. We appreciate your contribution! Documentation Links |
|
Hi, this is my first contribution. Could a maintainer please approve the workflows so the checks can run? |
|
Ended up merging #9872 instead as it was the first PR addressing this. Thanks for opening a PR regardless, it is appreciated! |
Resolves #9867
Description
This pull request replaces usage of the
new Array()constructor with array literals andpush()to comply with thestdlib/no-new-arrayESLint rule.Checklist
AI Assistance
If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?
Disclosure
I consulted ChatGPT to understand the contribution workflow, but the proposed changes were authored manually.