Skip to content

feat: add lapack/base/dla-gbrpvgrw#10262

Open
prajjwalbajpai wants to merge 5 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
prajjwalbajpai:dla_gbrpvgrw
Open

feat: add lapack/base/dla-gbrpvgrw#10262
prajjwalbajpai wants to merge 5 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
prajjwalbajpai:dla_gbrpvgrw

Conversation

@prajjwalbajpai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@prajjwalbajpai prajjwalbajpai commented Feb 13, 2026

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • adds lapack/base/dla-gbrpvgrw

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

I used ChatGPT to generate the test cases, and ran the testcases in fortran to confirm the output.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK). Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 13, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
lapack/base/dla-gbrpvgrw $\color{green}385/385$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}22/22$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}385/385$
$\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
{{alias}}( order, N, KL, KU, NCOLS, AB, LDAB, AFB, LDAFB )
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
{{alias}}( order, N, KL, KU, NCOLS, AB, LDAB, AFB, LDAFB )
{{alias}}( order, N, KL, KU, NCOLS, AB, LDAB, AFB, LDAFB )

amax = 0.0;
umax = 0.0;

rowStart = max( j - KU, 0 ); // Starting index for row
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
rowStart = max( j - KU, 0 ); // Starting index for row
rowStart = max( j - KU, 0 ); // Starting index for row

Don't align comments with tabs. Use spaces. Applies here and on the next line.

Comment on lines +88 to +91
sab1 = N;
sab2 = 1;
safb1 = N;
safb2 = 1;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of curiosity: is this the same way it is handled in LAPACKE? Just want to make sure that, when order is row-major, we simply ignore LDAB and LDAFB entirely.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It felt off to me as well, but in LAPACK, LDAB and LDAFB both are not used in the code. Their use is only limited to strides.

*     .. Executable Statements ..
*
      RPVGRW = 1.0D+0

      KD = KU + 1
      DO J = 1, NCOLS
         AMAX = 0.0D+0
         UMAX = 0.0D+0
         DO I = MAX( J-KU, 1 ), MIN( J+KL, N )
            AMAX = MAX( ABS( AB( KD+I-J, J)), AMAX )
         END DO
         DO I = MAX( J-KU, 1 ), J
            UMAX = MAX( ABS( AFB( KD+I-J, J ) ), UMAX )
         END DO
         IF ( UMAX /= 0.0D+0 ) THEN
            RPVGRW = MIN( AMAX / UMAX, RPVGRW )
         END IF
      END DO
      DLA_GBRPVGRW = RPVGRW
*
*     End of DLA_GBRPVGRW

Comment on lines +26 to +32
* ## Notes
*
* - Matrix `AB` is the matrix A in band storage, in rows 1 to KL+KU+1. The j-th column of A is stored in the j-th column of the matrix `AB` as `AB(KU+1+i-j,j) = A(i,j)` for max(1,j-KU)<=i<=min(N,j+kl).
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL`+`KU`+1, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL`+`KU`+2 to 2*`KL`+`KU`+1.
* - The leading dimension of `AB`, `LDAB` >= KL+KU+1.
* - The leading dimension of `AFB`, `LDAFB` >= 2*KL+KU+1.
*
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* ## Notes
*
* - Matrix `AB` is the matrix A in band storage, in rows 1 to KL+KU+1. The j-th column of A is stored in the j-th column of the matrix `AB` as `AB(KU+1+i-j,j) = A(i,j)` for max(1,j-KU)<=i<=min(N,j+kl).
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL`+`KU`+1, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL`+`KU`+2 to 2*`KL`+`KU`+1.
* - The leading dimension of `AB`, `LDAB` >= KL+KU+1.
* - The leading dimension of `AFB`, `LDAFB` >= 2*KL+KU+1.
*

These notes don't need to be included in the module entry point.

* limitations under the License.
*/

/* eslint-disable camelcase */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prefer disabling the precise line. So move this to L26 as a comment after the expression.

// eslint-disable-line camelcase

* limitations under the License.
*/

/* eslint-disable camelcase */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same thing. Disable the exact line, rather than for the entire file.

Comment on lines +11 to +28
[
0,
2,
5,
8
],
[
1,
4,
7,
10
],
[
3,
6,
9,
0
]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[
0,
2,
5,
8
],
[
1,
4,
7,
10
],
[
3,
6,
9,
0
]
[ 0, 2, 5, 8 ],
[ 1, 4, 7, 10 ],
[ 3, 6, 9, 0 ]

Prefer formatting this and the other matrices as matrices in order to aid readability when examining fixture files. Applies here and throughout the fixture files in this PR.

]
],
"AB": [
0,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly, arrange these visually to match the matrix. Otherwise, how is a reader supposed to know when a row begins and ends? You are making the reader do a lot of work here.

* limitations under the License.
*/

/* eslint-disable camelcase */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disable the line, not the file.

* limitations under the License.
*/

/* eslint-disable camelcase */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment. Applies here and everywhere else.

{
"name": "@stdlib/lapack/base/dla_gbrpvgrw",
"version": "0.0.0",
"description": "LAPACK routine to compute the LU factorization with complete pivoting of the general n-by-n matrix.",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't the correct description, right?


The `dla_gbrpvgrw` routine computes the reciprocal pivot growth factor for a general banded matrix `A`. The factorization has the form:

<!-- <equation class="equation" label="eq:rpg_factor" align="center" raw="RPGFactor = norm(A) / norm(U)" alt="Equation for calculating RPG Factor."> -->
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your raw TeX is incorrect.

<!-- <equation class="equation" label="eq:rpg_factor" align="center" raw="RPGFactor = norm(A) / norm(U)" alt="Equation for calculating RPG Factor."> -->

```math
\text{RPGFactor} = \frac{\text||A||}{\text||U||}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs improving. I suggest studying TeX a bit more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@prajjwalbajpai prajjwalbajpai Feb 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

By improving do you mean formatting or the text itself? I just showed the reciprocal pivot growth factor formula, should i include formation of AB and AFB from the matrix A for better understanding?

var AFB = new Float64Array( [ 0.0, 0.0, 5.0, 8.0, 0.0, 4.0, 7.0, 10.0, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 1.8272, 0.3333, 0.1111, -0.2716, 0.0 ] );

dla_gbrpvgrw( 'row-major', 4, 1, 1, 4, AB, 3, AFB, 4 );
// 1.0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't how we do returns annotations.

var AFB = new Float64Array( AFB0.buffer, AFB0.BYTES_PER_ELEMENT*1 ); // start at 2nd element

dla_gbrpvgrw( 'row-major', 4, 1, 1, 4, AB, 3, AFB, 4 );
// 1.0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment here and elsewhere.


## Notes

- Matrix `AB` is the matrix A in band storage, in rows 1 to KL+KU+1. The j-th column of A is stored in the j-th column of the matrix `AB` as `AB(KU+1+i-j,j) = A(i,j)` for max(1,j-KU)<=i<=min(N,j+kl).
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to ensure everything is from the viewpoint of 0-based indexing, not 1-based indexing. Applies here and throughout this PR.

* ## Notes
*
* - Matrix `AB` is the matrix A in band storage, in rows 1 to KL+KU+1. The j-th column of A is stored in the j-th column of the matrix `AB` as `AB(KU+1+i-j,j) = A(i,j)` for max(1,j-KU)<=i<=min(N,j+kl).
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL`+`KU`+1, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL`+`KU`+2 to 2*`KL`+`KU`+1.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your comments mix tabs and spaces. In Markdown (including Markdown in JSDoc), always use spaces. Applies here and elsewhere throughout this PR.

*
* @example
* var Float64Array = require( '@stdlib/array/float64' );
* var Int32Array = require( '@stdlib/array/int32' );
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are you importing Int32Array here. You are not using it.

* var AFB = new Float64Array( [ 0.0, 0.0, 5.0, 8.0, 0.0, 4.0, 7.0, 10.0, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 1.8272, 0.3333, 0.1111, -0.2716, 0.0 ] );
*
* dla_gbrpvgrw( 'row-major', 4, 1, 1, 4, AB, 3, AFB, 4 );
* // 1.0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't how we do returns annotations. Applies here and elsewhere in this PR.

* - Matrix `AB` is the matrix A in band storage, in rows 1 to KL+KU+1. The j-th column of A is stored in the j-th column of the matrix `AB` as `AB(KU+1+i-j,j) = A(i,j)` for max(1,j-KU)<=i<=min(N,j+kl).
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL`+`KU`+1, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL`+`KU`+2 to 2*`KL`+`KU`+1.
* - The leading dimension of `AB`, `LDAB` >= KL+KU+1.
* - The leading dimension of `AFB`, `LDAFB` >= 2*KL+KU+1.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tabs/Spaces.

*
* @example
* var Float64Array = require( '@stdlib/array/float64' );
* var Int32Array = require( '@stdlib/array/int32' );
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same thing. You are not using this import here and elsewhere in this PR.

'dtype': 'float64'
};

// Random input matrix;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Random input matrix;

};

// Random input matrix;
AFB = uniform( 4*N*N, -1.0, 1.0, opts );
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we need to be creating random banded matrices?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@prajjwalbajpai prajjwalbajpai Feb 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generating AFB from a banded matrix a requires routine DGBTRF. Since, it hasn't been implemented yet, I decided to write benchmarks like this. Maybe you can suggest a better way.

!>     AFB is DOUBLE PRECISION array, dimension (LDAFB,N)
!>     Details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as
!>     computed by DGBTRF.  U is stored as an upper triangular
!>     band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to KL+KU+1,
!>     and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored
!>     in rows KL+KU+2 to 2*KL+KU+1.

for ( i = min; i <= max; i++ ) {
N = floor( pow( pow( 10, i ), 1.0/2.0 ) );
f = createBenchmark( ord, N );
bench( format( '%s:order=%s,size=%d', pkg, ord, (N*N) ), f );
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
bench( format( '%s:order=%s,size=%d', pkg, ord, (N*N) ), f );
bench( format( '%s:order=%s,size=%d', pkg, ord, N*N ), f );

Avoid unnecessary parentheses.

for ( i = min; i <= max; i++ ) {
N = floor( pow( pow( 10, i ), 1.0/2.0 ) );
f = createBenchmark( ord, N );
bench( format( '%s:ndarray:order=%s,size=%d', pkg, ord, (N*N) ), f );
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
bench( format( '%s:ndarray:order=%s,size=%d', pkg, ord, (N*N) ), f );
bench( format( '%s:ndarray:order=%s,size=%d', pkg, ord, N*N ), f );

Comment on lines +34 to +45
var AB = new Float64Array( [ 0.0,
2.0,
5.0,
8.0,
1.0,
4.0,
7.0,
10.0,
3.0,
6.0,
9.0,
0.0 ] );
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
var AB = new Float64Array( [ 0.0,
2.0,
5.0,
8.0,
1.0,
4.0,
7.0,
10.0,
3.0,
6.0,
9.0,
0.0 ] );
var AB = new Float64Array([
0.0,
2.0,
5.0,
8.0,
1.0,
4.0,
7.0,
10.0,
3.0,
6.0,
9.0,
0.0
]);

Not sure why you are formatting this way, as deviates from throughout stdlib. Applies here and elsewhere throughout this PR.

* limitations under the License.
*/

/* eslint-disable camelcase */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disable the line, not the file.

* limitations under the License.
*/

/* eslint-disable camelcase */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disable the line, not the file.

* ## Notes
*
* - Matrix `AB` is the matrix A in band storage, in rows 1 to KL+KU+1. The j-th column of A is stored in the j-th column of the matrix `AB` as `AB(KU+1+i-j,j) = A(i,j)` for max(1,j-KU)<=i<=min(N,j+kl).
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL`+`KU`+1, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL`+`KU`+2 to 2*`KL`+`KU`+1.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL`+`KU`+1, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL`+`KU`+2 to 2*`KL`+`KU`+1.
* - Matrix `AFB` stores the details of the LU factorization of the band matrix A, as computed by `DGBTRF`. `U` is stored as an upper triangular band matrix with KL+KU superdiagonals in rows 1 to `KL+KU+1`, and the multipliers used during the factorization are stored in rows `KL+KU+2` to `2*KL+KU+1`.

Don't split code syntax like this. Write it like you would Markdown, and, in Markdown, we would not write a + b. We'd write a+b.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applies here and everywhere else in this PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left initial comments. This PR needs quite a bit of clean-up before it is ready for another review.

@kgryte kgryte added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. difficulty: 4 Likely to be moderately difficult. Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 28, 2026
@kgryte
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kgryte commented Feb 28, 2026

Another thing. This package should be renamed to dla-gbrpvgrw. We don't use snakecase for package names. See https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/tree/develop/lib/node_modules/%40stdlib/lapack/base/dge-trans for naming precedent. The LAPACK routine is dge_trans and yet we use kebabcase for the package name.

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@prajjwalbajpai prajjwalbajpai changed the title feat: add lapack/base/dla_gbrpvgrw feat: add lapack/base/dla-gbrpvgrw Mar 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

difficulty: 4 Likely to be moderately difficult. Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK). Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants