feat: add implementation of math/base/special/sqrt1pm1f

[shubham220420]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: passed
• task: lint_repl_help status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_examples status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Ref: #649

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• This PR adds the C and JS implementation of math/base/special/sqrt1pm1f.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: Add C implementations to base special math functions (tracking issue) #649

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/sqrt1pm1f	$\color{green}212/212$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}9/9$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}212/212$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[whizzel]

@shubham220420 Since this is a float32 implementation (sqrt1pm1f), should this use
@stdlib/math/base/special/expm1f instead of expm1?

Using the float64 version here would introduce mixed precision in an *f
module. Just wanted to confirm if that was intentional.

[shubham220420]

@shubham220420 Since this is a float32 implementation (sqrt1pm1f), should this use @stdlib/math/base/special/expm1f instead of expm1?

Using the float64 version here would introduce mixed precision in an *f module. Just wanted to confirm if that was intentional.

expm1 was used since there is no implementation for expm1f as of now in the codebase, therefore the result is rounded-of using f32 as you can see in the implementation,
once the expm1f implementation is added ( i am working on that too ), this code can be refactored in future to use that instead of expm1

[whizzel]

Got it, that makes sense.

[Planeshifter]

Left initial round of review comments. Thanks for working on this!

[Planeshifter]

Landing this PR will require presence of math/base/special/expm1.

[shubham220420]

Landing this PR will require presence of math/base/special/expm1.

i guess you meant to say expm1f here, and thats right, we can wait until its added and then I can refactor this code to use that.