Skip to content

chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #10400)#10404

Closed
rautelaKamal wants to merge 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
rautelaKamal:fix/-10400-lint-errors
Closed

chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #10400)#10404
rautelaKamal wants to merge 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
rautelaKamal:fix/-10400-lint-errors

Conversation

@rautelaKamal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rautelaKamal rautelaKamal commented Feb 21, 2026

Ref #10400.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Fixes 5 JavaScript stdlib/eol-open-bracket-spacing linting errors in lib/node_modules/@stdlib/assert/has-property/examples/index.js where spaces were erroneously included between opening parentheses and nested object expressions at the ends of lines.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

I consulted an AI agent to help identify and automatically fix the basic formatting failures dictated by the stdlib eslint rules, which were then manually verified and submitted.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Feb 21, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
assert/has-property $\color{green}106/106$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}106/106$
$\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. and removed Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. labels Feb 22, 2026
@kgryte
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kgryte commented Feb 28, 2026

Ref: #10401

@kgryte kgryte added autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 28, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for working on this pull request. However, we cannot accept your contribution as the issue this pull request seeks to resolve has already been addressed in a different pull request or commit.

Thank you again for your interest in stdlib, and we look forward to reviewing your future contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants