Skip to content

docs: improve doctests for complex number instances in lapack/base/clacgv#8655

Merged
kgryte merged 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
DivyanshuVortex:docs/improve-lapack-clacgv-doctests
Dec 1, 2025
Merged

docs: improve doctests for complex number instances in lapack/base/clacgv#8655
kgryte merged 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
DivyanshuVortex:docs/improve-lapack-clacgv-doctests

Conversation

@DivyanshuVortex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lapack/base/clacgv


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:

  • task: lint_filenames status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown status: passed
  • task: lint_package_json status: na
  • task: lint_repl_help status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_python status: na
  • task: lint_r status: na
  • task: lint_c_src status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
  • task: lint_shell status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
  • task: lint_license_headers status: passed

Resolves a part of #8641

Description

This pull request updates documentation examples for the array/base/accessor-getter package to correctly use complex number instance notation.

Related Issues

None.

Questions

No.

Other

No.

Checklist

AI Assistance

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}


@stdlib-js/reviewers

…acgv

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK). Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Nov 30, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
lapack/base/clacgv $\color{green}235/235$
$color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}12/12$
$color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}235/235$
$color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@kgryte kgryte added Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Dec 1, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte kgryte merged commit 5cf2090 into stdlib-js:develop Dec 1, 2025
85 checks passed
@DivyanshuVortex DivyanshuVortex deleted the docs/improve-lapack-clacgv-doctests branch December 2, 2025 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK).

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants