feat: add constants/float16/inv-two-pi

[Amansingh0807]

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

task: lint_filenames status: passed
task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
task: lint_markdown status: passed
task: lint_package_json status: passed
task: lint_repl_help status: passed
task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
task: lint_python status: na
task: lint_r status: na
task: lint_c_src status: na
task: lint_c_examples status: na
task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
task: lint_shell status: na
task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves none

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• add constants/float16/inv-two-pi

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• #{{TODO: add related issue number}}

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
constants/float16/inv-two-pi	$\color{green}45/45$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}0/0$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}45/45$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[Neerajpathak07]

@Amansingh0807 Your Api call for the module should be consistent in the documentation as well which is in README.md. Would you mind changing that!!

[Amansingh0807]

Doing it.

[Neerajpathak07]

Suggested change

	Inverse of twice the mathematical constant [π][pi].
	Inverse of twice the mathematical constant [π][pi] (1/(2π)).

[Neerajpathak07]

Suggested change

	> Inverse of twice the mathematical constant [π][pi].
	> Inverse of twice the mathematical constant [π][pi] (1/(2π)).

[Neerajpathak07]

Also for now we do not have the double and single precision version of inv-two-pi in the code base would you mind adding those as well!!

[Amansingh0807]

Also for now we do not have the double and single precision version of inv-two-pi in the code base would you mind adding those as well!!

Doing it as well, Thank you for Pointing out.

[Amansingh0807]

Hi @Neerajpathak07,
Thanks for the review! I have applied the suggested changes, and I’m now working on adding the double-precision and single-precision versions of inv-two-pi as well.
Will open the PRs shortly.

[Neerajpathak07]

Great!! Looking forward to it XD