Added a new list exercise to Section 3.4#87
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks. It's definitely good to have more basic exercises with recursion. Once people arrive at "Recursion and Folds", it would be another good exercise to re-implement many of the recursive functions from other chapters in a tail-recursive manner. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At the beginning of 6.iii, in the part discussing Vect concatenation, there was a reference to list concatenation:
I implemented that as an exercise (and checked it against Prelude.List.(++)) and thought that was interesting. It seemed to fit better in Section 3.iv though. I do think because there aren't a lot of List recursion exercises there, having another one is nice.