codecheck: Fix typos in strings and comments [autosync]

Author: github-actions[bot]

CodeCheck/All Checks/Language Specific/C and C++/Exception Handling/CPP_EH005/check.upy

@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def define_options(check):
     check.options().checkbox('tryIsThrow', 'Called in try = implicit throw', False)
     check.options().checkbox('ctorIsThrow', 'Constructor = implicit throw', False)
     check.options().checkbox('dtorIsThrow', 'Destructor = implicit throw', False)
-    check.options().text('ignoredExtensions', 'Ignored file extensions (space-separated, dots not neccessary)', '.c')
+    check.options().text('ignoredExtensions', 'Ignored file extensions (space-separated, dots not necessary)', '.c')
 
 
 def functionThrows(function):

CodeCheck/All Checks/Language Specific/C and C++/Unnecessary Constructs/CPP_U001/check.upl

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ sub use_context {
     return $lexeme;
 }
 
-# Indicate a call reference has occured in a non-use context.
+# Indicate a call reference has occurred in a non-use context.
 sub nouse_value {
   my $ref = shift;
   my $check = shift;

CodeCheck/Published Standards/AUTOSAR/A15-3-4/A15-3-4.cpp

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ void F1() noexcept(false)
 void F2() noexcept(false)
 {
     std::int32_t ret =
-        Fn(); // UndCC_FalseNeg - can not be sure whether fn() throws or not - False negative becasue it isn't plausible to flag every function call like this
+        Fn(); // UndCC_FalseNeg - can not be sure whether fn() throws or not - False negative because it isn't plausible to flag every function call like this
 
     if (ret < 10)
     {
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void F3() noexcept(false)
     }
 
     catch (std::exception& e) // UndCC_Violation - caught exception is too
-        // general, no information which error occured
+        // general, no information which error occurred
     {
         // Nothing to do
         throw;

CodeCheck/Published Standards/AUTOSAR/A15-3-4/check.upy

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void F3() noexcept(false)
   }
 
   catch (std::exception& e) // Non-compliant - caught exception is too
-  // general, no information which error occured
+  // general, no information which error occurred
   {
     // Nothing to do
     throw;

CodeCheck/Published Standards/SEI Cert Standards/C/EXP46-C/check.upy

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ def check(check, file):
         if lexeme.inactive():
             continue
 
-        # Find any occurance of ^, &, or |
+        # Find any occurrence of ^, &, or |
         if re.match(r'(\^|&|\|)$', lexeme.text()):
             prevLex = lexeme
             nextLex = lexeme

CodeCheck/Published Standards/SEI Cert Standards/C/POS39-C/test0.c

@@ -24,5 +24,5 @@ void fn_good_recv(int sock) {
   }
 
   num = ntohl(num);
-  printf("We recieved %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
+  printf("We received %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
 }

CodeCheck/Published Standards/SEI Cert Standards/C/POS39-C/test1.c

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ void fn_good_recvfrom(int sock, struct sockaddr *src_addr, socklen_t *src_len) {
   }
 
   num = ntohl(num);
-  printf("We recieved %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
+  printf("We received %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
 }
 
 void fn_bad_send(int sock) {
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void fn_good_send(int sock) {
   }
 
   num = htonl(num);
-  printf("We recieved %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
+  printf("We received %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
 }
 
 void fn_bad_sendto(int sock, struct sockaddr *dest_addr, socklen_t *dest_len) {
@@ -90,5 +90,5 @@ void fn_good_sendto(int sock, struct sockaddr *dest_addr, socklen_t *dest_len) {
   }
 
   num = htonl(num);
-  printf("We recieved %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
+  printf("We received %u from the network!\n", (unsigned int)num);
 }

CodeCheck/Published Standards/SEI Cert Standards/Java/NUM13-J/check.upy

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ def test_global():
 
 
 def literalToInt(text):
-    # Remove unneccessary characters
+    # Remove unnecessary characters
     text = re.sub(r'_|l|L', '', text)
     if not re.match(r'0x[\d|a-f]+$', text, re.IGNORECASE):
         text = re.sub(r'f|F', '', text)

CodeCheck/SciTools' Recommended Checks/RECOMMENDED_07/check.upy

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ is not restricted. This may be inconsistent with developer expectations.</p>
             'CPP_P019': """\
 <p><b>Rationale</b></p>
 <p>Placing macros definitions inside blocks makes it appear that the definition
-has a scope of that block. Place macros definitions at the begining of the file
+has a scope of that block. Place macros definitions at the beginning of the file
 to avoid confusion.</p>""",
             'M16-0-2': """\
 <p><b>Rule</b></p>

CodeCheck/clang/warnings.json

@@ -6728,7 +6728,7 @@
         "<p><b>Description</b></p>",
         "<p>Report findings of the compiler warning flag: -Wmicrosoft-extra-qualification</p>",
         "<p><b>Summary</b></p>",
-        "<p>Using the scope resolution operator <code>::</code> when it is not neccessary is a language extension by Microsoft.</p>",
+        "<p>Using the scope resolution operator <code>::</code> when it is not necessary is a language extension by Microsoft.</p>",
         "<p><b>Diagnostic Text</b></p>","<table><colgroup><col style='width: 100%'></colgroup><tbody><tr><td style='vertical-align:middle;white-space:nowrap'><p><span>warning:</span>&nbsp;<span>extra qualification on member</span>&nbsp;<em>A</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>",
         "<p><a href='https://releases.llvm.org/16.0.0/tools/clang/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wmicrosoft-extra-qualification'>LLVM Documentation</a></p>"
       ]