Update recommended maximum image upload sizes for Strapi Cloud#3318
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the recommended maximum image upload sizes on the Strapi Cloud upload size limits page, using re-verified memory-probe measurements taken on Strapi 5.48.1+ (which includes strapi/strapi#26678, avoiding buffering large uploads for MIME detection). The re-measurement raised several large-file ceilings on the 512 MiB budget that backs the Essential column: for Processing on, JPEG 24→26, PNG 8→10, TIFF 16→24, and AVIF 66→92 MP; for Processing off, JPEG 200→224, PNG 20→24, and AVIF 74→96 MP. WebP is unchanged in both modes because its cliff is the full-resolution re-encode, not the file buffer that #26678 addressed. The Pro & Scale AVIF values are raised to match the Essential floor so the smaller plan never appears to allow a larger image than the larger plan, since AVIF is bounded by the 200 MB request cap rather than RAM. TIFF Processing off was not re-measured, so it is set to the same conservative floor as Processing on rather than fabricating a higher figure.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code