Enhance papers

Author: denisecase

profile/README.md

@@ -135,14 +135,55 @@ They keep interpretation from leaking into the neutral substrate.
 
 ## Papers
 
-Papers provide theoretical justification for foundational specifications.
-They are explanatory, not normative.
+Structural Explainability consists of a small formal core (SE-100: Neutrality; SE-200: Identity Regimes)
+and a parallel stewardship track (SE-ST-Gx) addressing governance over time.
+The stewardship track examines how neutral systems are defined, audited, stressed, and repaired in real institutional contexts.
+
+The two formal papers provide theoretical justification for foundational specifications.
+They are explanatory rather than normative (they describe what must be true for such systems to work, not what people should believe or do).
+
+Stewardship papers build on the formal core but do not modify or extend it.
+
+| Repository                                                                                              | Focus              | Status    | Description                                                                                                                                  |
+| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | --------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| [paper-100-neutral-substrate](https://github.com/structural-explainability/paper-100-neutral-substrate) | Neutrality theorem | Submitted | Narrative exposition of the neutrality theorem and its formal proof, establishing design constraints for neutral representational substrates |
+| [paper-200-identity-regimes](https://github.com/structural-explainability/paper-200-identity-regimes)   | Identity regimes   | Submitted | Narrative exposition of the identity-regimes result and its formal justification                                                             |
+
+About:
+
+ - [Neutrality](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14271): If you want to build an information system for domains
+   where people legitimately disagree (like law or politics),
+   the core of the system must be neutral;
+   if you bake in causes, values, or conclusions,
+   the system cannot represent disagreement accurately.
+
+- [Six Types](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16152): To explain events
+  (and represent responsibility, evidence, and meaning) in neutral systems,
+  information must be organized into six distinct kinds of entities;
+  fewer lose essential distinctions, and more add redundancy.
+
+The two formal papers provide theoretical justification for foundational specifications.
+They are explanatory rather than normative (they describe what must be true for such systems to work, not what people should believe or do).
+
+Stewardship papers build on the formal core but do not modify or extend it.
 
 | Repository                                                                                              | Focus              | Status    | Description                                                                                                                                  |
 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | --------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
 | [paper-100-neutral-substrate](https://github.com/structural-explainability/paper-100-neutral-substrate) | Neutrality theorem | Submitted | Narrative exposition of the neutrality theorem and its formal proof, establishing design constraints for neutral representational substrates |
 | [paper-200-identity-regimes](https://github.com/structural-explainability/paper-200-identity-regimes)   | Identity regimes   | Submitted | Narrative exposition of the identity-regimes result and its formal justification                                                             |
 
+About:
+
+ - [Neutrality](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14271): If you want to build an information system for domains
+   where people legitimately disagree (like law or politics),
+   the core of the system must be neutral;
+   if you bake in causes, values, or conclusions,
+   the system cannot represent disagreement accurately.
+
+- [Six Types](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16152): To explain events
+  (and represent responsibility, evidence, and meaning) in neutral systems,
+  information must be organized into six distinct kinds of entities;
+  fewer lose essential distinctions, and more add redundancy.
 
 ## Design Commitments