Skip to content

Commit a4f610f

Browse files
denisecasedenisecase
committed
dashboard
1 parent e95e7e5 commit a4f610f

1 file changed

Lines changed: 28 additions & 23 deletions

File tree

‎profile/README.md‎

Lines changed: 28 additions & 23 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -19,13 +19,16 @@ that define, justify, and defend that neutral space.
1919

2020
## Organization Structure
2121

22-
This organization is structured around three roles:
22+
This organization is structured around roles:
23+
24+
| Role | Purpose |
25+
| ----------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- |
26+
| [**Specifications**](#normative-specifications) | Define what must be true for admissibility |
27+
| [**Formalizations**](#formalizations) | Demonstrate that specifications are internally consistent |
28+
| [**Foundations**](#foundations) | Establish the underlying theoretical results |
29+
| [**Papers**](#papers) | Justify why the constraints are necessary and unavoidable |
30+
| **Boundaries & Overlays** | Define how interpretation may attach without entering the substrate |
2331

24-
| Role | Purpose |
25-
| ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------- |
26-
| **Specifications** | Define what must be true for admissibility |
27-
| **Formalizations** | Demonstrate internal coherence and consistency |
28-
| **Papers** | Justify why the constraints are necessary and unavoidable |
2932

3033
## Normative Specifications
3134

@@ -40,18 +43,19 @@ They are normative only in the sense of defining constraints, not interpretation
4043
| [spec-ep](https://github.com/structural-explainability/spec-ep) | Graph evolution over accountable entities | Normative |
4144
| [spec-cee](https://github.com/structural-explainability/spec-cee) | Contextual interfaces for explanation, attestation, and provenance | Normative |
4245

43-
## Formal Reference Implementations (Lean)
46+
## Formalizations
4447

45-
These repositories do not define meaning or behavior.
46-
They demonstrate that the specifications are internally consistent and composable.
48+
These repositories **do not define meaning or behavior**.
49+
They demonstrate that the specifications are internally consistent,
50+
coherent, and composable under formal reasoning.
4751

4852
| Repository | Purpose | CI | Description |
4953
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- |
5054
| [AccountableEntities](https://github.com/structural-explainability/AccountableEntities) | Entity-regime instantiation | ![CI](https://github.com/structural-explainability/AccountableEntities/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg?branch=main) | Formalization of AE identity regimes |
5155
| [ExchangeProtocol](https://github.com/structural-explainability/ExchangeProtocol) | Neutral exchange substrate | ![CI](https://github.com/structural-explainability/ExchangeProtocol/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg?branch=main) | Formalization of EP graph evolution |
5256
| [StructuralExplainability](https://github.com/structural-explainability/StructuralExplainability) | Cross-cutting constraints | ![CI](https://github.com/structural-explainability/StructuralExplainability/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg?branch=main) | Neutrality and conformance predicates |
5357

54-
## Foundations (Lean)
58+
## Foundations
5559

5660
| Repository | Purpose | CI | Description |
5761
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
@@ -68,17 +72,18 @@ They are explanatory, not normative.
6872
| [paper-100-neutral-substrate](https://github.com/structural-explainability/paper-100-neutral-substrate) | Neutrality theorem | Submitted | Narrative exposition of the neutrality theorem and its formal proof, establishing design constraints for neutral representational substrates |
6973
| [paper-200-identity-regimes](https://github.com/structural-explainability/paper-200-identity-regimes) | Identity regimes | Submitted | Narrative exposition of the identity-regimes result and its formal justification |
7074

71-
## Incubating Work
72-
73-
These are in-progress structural layers or boundary definitions.
75+
## Boundary and Overlay Specifications
7476

75-
| Repository | Purpose | Status | Description |
76-
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
77-
| [ContextualEvidence](https://github.com/structural-explainability/ContextualEvidence) | Explanation substrate | Draft | Neutral structural forms for explanations, evidence groupings, and contextual justification, without asserting causal models, normative judgments, or interpretive conclusions |
78-
| [InterpretationBoundary](https://github.com/structural-explainability/InterpretationBoundary) | Substrate-interpretation boundary | Conceptual | Boundary conditions under which external legal, ethical, or policy frameworks may interpret or profile substrate records without altering the structural core |
77+
These repositories define **additional structural layers or boundaries**
78+
that operate relative to the neutral substrate.
79+
They do not alter identity, structure, or recorded change.
7980

81+
| Repository | Purpose | Status | Description |
82+
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
83+
| CEE | Explanation overlay | Draft | Structural forms for contextual explanation and evidence |
84+
| InterpretationBoundary | Interpretation boundary | Conceptual | Conditions under which external frameworks may interpret substrate records |
8085

81-
## Dissemination
86+
## Template (SE Appendix)
8287

8388
| Repository | Purpose | Status |
8489
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |
@@ -130,17 +135,17 @@ while interpretation, explanation, and judgment are constrained
130135
to remain external to the substrate.
131136

132137
- **Accountable Entities** define identity regimes
133-
that allow entities to persist across time and change.
138+
that allow entities to persist across time and change.
134139
- **Exchange Protocol** defines the evolution of structural relationships among those entities,
135-
recording change without embedding explanation.
140+
recording change without embedding explanation.
136141

137142
Together, they form the structural substrate.
138143

139144
- **Contextual Evidence & Explanations** provide the structural interface
140-
by which external interpretation may be attached to, referenced from, and reasoned about,
141-
without entering or contaminating the substrate.
145+
by which external interpretation may be attached to, referenced from, and reasoned about,
146+
without entering or contaminating the substrate.
142147
- Context tags, explanations, attestations, and provenance are not facts about the world;
143-
they are structured references to interpretive acts that occur outside the substrate.
148+
they are structured references to interpretive acts that occur outside the substrate.
144149

145150
Interpretation does not disappear.
146151
It is made explicit, attributable, and contestable.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)