Skip to content

chore(deps): upgrade TypeScript 5.9.3 → 6.0.3 (explicit dep)#17

Draft
xdanger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/sleepy-ritchie-MtgEZ
Draft

chore(deps): upgrade TypeScript 5.9.3 → 6.0.3 (explicit dep)#17
xdanger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/sleepy-ritchie-MtgEZ

Conversation

@xdanger

@xdanger xdanger commented May 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Adds typescript as an explicit devDependency at ^6.0.0 (resolves to 6.0.3)
  • Previously TypeScript was auto-installed as a peer dependency of typescript-eslint at 5.9.3
  • All other direct dependencies were already at their latest stable versions (confirmed via pnpm outdated + npm show)

Dependency scan results

Package Current Latest Action
@eslint/js 10.0.1 10.0.1 ✅ up to date
autocorrect-node 2.14.0 2.14.0 ✅ up to date
eslint 10.3.0 10.3.0 ✅ up to date
globals 17.6.0 17.6.0 ✅ up to date
husky 9.1.7 9.1.7 ✅ up to date
lint-staged 17.0.4 17.0.4 ✅ up to date
prettier 3.8.3 3.8.3 ✅ up to date
typescript 5.9.3 (peer, implicit) 6.0.3 ⬆️ upgraded + made explicit
typescript-eslint 8.59.3 8.59.3 ✅ up to date
pnpm 11.1.1 11.1.1 ✅ up to date

Breaking-change risk

Low. TypeScript 6.0 removes some deprecated APIs and tightens checks, but:

  • typescript-eslint@8.59.3 explicitly supports >=4.8.4 <6.1.0, so 6.0.3 is within range
  • No src/ directory exists yet — no TypeScript source to re-check
  • pnpm audit reports no vulnerabilities

Test plan

  • pnpm install resolves cleanly with TypeScript 6.0.3
  • pnpm lint passes (ESLint + Prettier checks green)

https://claude.ai/code/session_01SYPqPxEz3auppJaTYH6Jbr


Generated by Claude Code

Previously TypeScript was auto-installed as a peer dependency of
typescript-eslint at 5.9.3. This commit pins it explicitly as a
devDependency at ^6.0.0.

typescript-eslint@8.59.3 supports TypeScript >=4.8.4 <6.1.0, so
6.0.3 is fully within the supported range. All other direct
dependencies were already at their latest stable versions.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01SYPqPxEz3auppJaTYH6Jbr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants