๐ :: (#952) ํ ํฐ ์ฌ๋ฐ๊ธ ์ค๋ณต ํธ์ถ ๋ฌธ์ ํด๊ฒฐ#953
Hidden character warning
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 38 minutes and 46 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running โ you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). โ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. ๐ฆ How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. โน๏ธ Review infoโ๏ธ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ๐ Files selected for processing (2)
๐ WalkthroughWalkthroughRefactors ChangesJWT Core Refactor
Estimated code review effort๐ฏ 3 (Moderate) | โฑ๏ธ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
๐ฅ Pre-merge checks | โ 4 | โ 1โ Failed checks (1 warning)
โ Passed checks (4 passed)
โ๏ธ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. โจ Finishing Touches๐งช Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
๐ค Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
`@core/jwt/src/main/java/team/aliens/dms/android/core/jwt/network/authenticator/JwtAuthenticator.kt`:
- Around line 77-86: The checkS3Request(url.toString()) call is currently placed
inside the any() lambda predicate, which means it will never be evaluated if
ignoreRequests.requests is empty since the any() function short-circuits without
executing the lambda. Move the S3 request check outside of the any() loop in the
shouldBeIgnored() method so that checkS3Request is always evaluated
independently, allowing S3 requests to be properly ignored regardless of whether
there are other ignore requests configured.
๐ช Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
โน๏ธ Review info
โ๏ธ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b8c0415b-fb5d-4cd1-b915-66d99d97a4eb
๐ Files selected for processing (3)
core/jwt/src/main/java/team/aliens/dms/android/core/jwt/JwtProviderImpl.ktcore/jwt/src/main/java/team/aliens/dms/android/core/jwt/network/JwtReissueManager.ktcore/jwt/src/main/java/team/aliens/dms/android/core/jwt/network/authenticator/JwtAuthenticator.kt
๊ฐ์
์์ ์ฌํญ
์ถ๊ฐ ๋ก ํ ๋ง
Summary by CodeRabbit