Skip to content

Commit 01d836b

Browse files
AlexMikhalevTerraphim CITerraphim AIclaude
authored
Validation framework 413 (#443)
* feat(middleware): add Quickwit haystack integration with hybrid index discovery Implements Phase 3 (Steps 1-10) of disciplined development plan for Quickwit search engine integration. Adds comprehensive log and observability data search capabilities to Terraphim AI. Core Implementation: - ServiceType::Quickwit enum variant for configuration - QuickwitHaystackIndexer implementing IndexMiddleware trait - Hybrid index selection (explicit configuration or auto-discovery) - Dual authentication support (Bearer token and Basic Auth) - Glob pattern filtering for auto-discovered indexes - HTTP request construction with query parameters - JSON response parsing with graceful error handling - Document transformation from Quickwit hits to Terraphim Documents - Sequential multi-index search with result merging Technical Details: - Follows QueryRsHaystackIndexer pattern for consistency - 10-second HTTP timeout with graceful degradation - Token redaction in logs (security) - Empty Index return on errors (no crashes) - 15 unit tests covering config parsing, filtering, auth - Compatible with Quickwit 0.7+ REST API Configuration from try_search reference: - Production: https://logs.terraphim.cloud/api/ - Authentication: Basic Auth (cloudflare/password) - Indexes: workers-logs, cadro-service-layer Design Documents: - .docs/research-quickwit-haystack-integration.md (Phase 1) - .docs/design-quickwit-haystack-integration.md (Phase 2) - .docs/quickwit-autodiscovery-tradeoffs.md (trade-off analysis) Next: Integration tests, agent E2E tests, example configs, documentation Co-Authored-By: Terraphim AI <noreply@terraphim.ai> * docs: add validation framework research and plan approvals * Add Tauri signing setup and improved build scripts - Add comprehensive Tauri signing setup script with 1Password integration - Add temporary key generation for testing - Update build-all-formats.sh to use Tauri signing configuration - Add detailed setup instructions and security notes - Support both 1Password integration and manual key setup This enables proper code signing for Terraphim desktop packages while maintaining security best practices with 1Password integration. * feat(validation): add validation framework and performance benchmarks * Update Cargo.lock and build artifacts after merge * Clean up merge artifacts and broken tests * chore(validation): remove backup test files * fix(packaging): complete build-all-formats.sh with all format scripts - Fix duplicate regex dependency in terraphim_automata/Cargo.toml - Add individual build scripts for deb, rpm, arch, appimage, flatpak, snap - Fix scope bug in build-all-formats.sh where format variable was out of scope - Add proper artifact collection from multiple directories - Add build result tracking and summary reporting - Make scripts cross-platform compatible Co-Authored-By: Terraphim AI <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(deps): update Cargo.lock * test(validation): restore integration tests behind feature flags * docs: add validation framework reports and documentation - Add runtime-validation-hooks.md - Add validation-report-validation-framework.md - Add verification-report-validation-framework.md - Add vmodel-final-report-validation-framework.md - Update README with validation framework info - Fix quickwit.rs borrow pattern * fix: update Document constructors for new API Update terraphim_validation test fixtures to include new Document fields: - doc_type - synonyms - route - priority Fixes compilation errors after rebase onto main. * ci: add workspace permission fix for self-hosted runners Add 'Fix workspace permissions' step to all CI jobs running on self-hosted runners. This prevents EACCES permission errors when the checkout action tries to clean files created by Docker containers with different ownership. The fix runs before Pre-checkout cleanup and ensures the runner user owns all files in the workspace. Fixes consistent permission issues on terraphim-ai self-hosted runners. * ci: add disk cleanup step to prevent disk full errors Add 'Disk cleanup' step to all Rust jobs that runs after checkout but before Rust toolchain installation. Cleans up: - ~/.rustup/tmp/* (temp files from previous installs) - ~/.cargo/registry/cache/* (cached crate downloads) - ~/.cargo/git/checkouts/* (git dependencies) - Docker system prune (unused containers/images) Also shows df -h output for debugging disk usage. This prevents 'No space left on device' errors during Rust toolchain installation on self-hosted runners. * fix(spawner): remove needless borrow in spawn_process call * fix: resolve clippy warnings across workspace Fix multiple clippy errors preventing CI from passing: - terraphim_spawner: Remove needless borrow in spawn_process call - terraphim_middleware: Replace or_else/unwrap_or_else with or/unwrap_or - terraphim_orchestrator: Remove .clone() from Copy type (ProcessId) - terraphim_tinyclaw: Use std::hint::black_box instead of deprecated criterion::black_box - terraphim_github_runner_server: Use slice indexing instead of deprecated as_slice() - terraphim_validation: Remove unnecessary borrow in try_parse_from - terraphim_agent: Add repl-web-advanced feature and allow unused imports in test All changes are non-functional refactoring to satisfy clippy -D warnings. * ci: add cargo clean before clippy to ensure fresh build * ci: add verbose clippy error output for debugging * ci: simplify clippy step and add RUST_BACKTRACE (trigger rebuild) * fix(server): restore get_role_extra helper functions with proper doc comments * fix(server): remove duplicate helper functions, use inline logic * fix(server): fix doc_lazy_continuation clippy warnings Add blank lines after first lines of doc comments to fix clippy warnings about lazy continuation: - Add blank line after '4. Hardcoded fallback (lowest priority)' - Add blank line after 'Get a string value from Role.extra...' - Add doc comment for resolve_llm_config function Part of: #443 --------- Co-authored-by: Terraphim CI <alex@terraphim.ai> Co-authored-by: Terraphim AI <noreply@terraphim.ai> Co-authored-by: Terraphim AI <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 parent 516edef commit 01d836b

52 files changed

Lines changed: 16428 additions & 1282 deletions

File tree

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

.docs/constraints-analysis.md

Lines changed: 257 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
1+
# Terraphim AI Release Constraints Analysis
2+
3+
## Business Constraints
4+
5+
### Release Frequency and Cadence
6+
- **Continuous Delivery Pressure**: Community expects regular updates with bug fixes
7+
- **Feature Release Timeline**: New features need predictable release windows
8+
- **Patch Release Speed**: Security fixes must be deployed rapidly
9+
- **Backward Compatibility**: Must maintain API stability between major versions
10+
- **Version Bumping Strategy**: Semantic versioning with clear breaking change policies
11+
12+
### Community and User Expectations
13+
- **Zero-Downtime Updates**: Production deployments should not require service interruption
14+
- **Rollback Capability**: Users need ability to revert problematic updates
15+
- **Multi-Version Support**: Ability to run multiple versions concurrently for testing
16+
- **Documentation同步**: Release notes must match actual changes
17+
- **Transparent Roadmap**: Clear communication about future changes and deprecations
18+
19+
### License and Compliance Requirements
20+
- **Open Source Compliance**: All licenses must be properly declared
21+
- **Third-Party Dependencies**: SPDX compliance and vulnerability disclosure
22+
- **Export Controls**: No restricted cryptographic components without compliance
23+
- **Data Privacy**: GDPR and privacy law compliance for user data handling
24+
- **Attribution Requirements**: Proper credit for open source dependencies
25+
26+
## Technical Constraints
27+
28+
### Multi-Platform Build Complexity
29+
30+
#### Architecture Support Matrix
31+
| Architecture | Build Tool | Cross-Compilation | Testing Capability |
32+
|--------------|------------|-------------------|--------------------|
33+
| x86_64-linux | Native | Not needed | Full CI/CD |
34+
| aarch64-linux | Cross | QEMU required | Limited testing |
35+
| armv7-linux | Cross | QEMU required | Limited testing |
36+
| x86_64-macos | Native (self-hosted) | Not needed | Partial testing |
37+
| aarch64-macos | Native (self-hosted) | Not needed | Partial testing |
38+
| x86_64-windows | Native | Not needed | Full CI/CD |
39+
40+
#### Toolchain Dependencies
41+
- **Rust Version**: Consistent toolchain across all platforms
42+
- **Cross-Compilation Tools**: QEMU, binutils for non-native builds
43+
- **System Libraries**: Platform-specific dependency management
44+
- **Certificate Signing**: Platform-specific code signing certificates
45+
- **Package Building**: cargo-deb, cargo-rpm, Tauri bundler tools
46+
47+
### Dependency Management Constraints
48+
49+
#### System-Level Dependencies
50+
```toml
51+
# Example dependency constraints
52+
[dependencies]
53+
# Core dependencies with version ranges
54+
tokio = { version = "1.0", features = ["full"] }
55+
serde = { version = "1.0", features = ["derive"] }
56+
clap = { version = "4.0", features = ["derive"] }
57+
58+
# Platform-specific dependencies
59+
[target.'cfg(unix)'.dependencies]
60+
nix = "0.27"
61+
62+
[target.'cfg(windows)'.dependencies]
63+
winapi = { version = "0.3", features = ["winuser"] }
64+
65+
[target.'cfg(target_os = "macos")'.dependencies]
66+
core-foundation = "0.9"
67+
```
68+
69+
#### Package Manager Conflicts
70+
- **APT (Debian/Ubuntu)**: Conflicts with existing packages, dependency versions
71+
- **RPM (RHEL/CentOS/Fedora)**: Different naming conventions, requires explicit dependencies
72+
- **Pacman (Arch)**: AUR package maintenance, user expectations for PKGBUILD standards
73+
- **Homebrew**: Formula maintenance, bottle building for pre-compiled binaries
74+
75+
### Build Infrastructure Constraints
76+
77+
#### GitHub Actions Limitations
78+
- **Runner Availability**: Limited self-hosted runners for macOS builds
79+
- **Build Time Limits**: 6-hour job timeout for complex builds
80+
- **Storage Limits**: Artifact storage and retention policies
81+
- **Concurrency Limits**: Parallel job execution restrictions
82+
- **Network Bandwidth**: Large binary upload/download constraints
83+
84+
#### Resource Requirements
85+
- **Memory Usage**: Cross-compilation can be memory-intensive
86+
- **CPU Time**: Multi-architecture builds require significant compute
87+
- **Storage Space**: Build cache management across platforms
88+
- **Network I/O**: Dependency downloads and artifact uploads
89+
90+
## User Experience Constraints
91+
92+
### Installation Simplicity
93+
94+
#### One-Command Installation Goals
95+
```bash
96+
# Ideal user experience
97+
curl -fsSL https://install.terraphim.ai | sh
98+
99+
# Should handle automatically:
100+
# - Platform detection
101+
# - Architecture detection
102+
# - Package manager selection
103+
# - Dependency resolution
104+
# - Service configuration
105+
# - User setup
106+
```
107+
108+
#### Package Manager Integration
109+
- **Zero Configuration**: Default settings work out of the box
110+
- **Service Management**: Automatic systemd/launchd service setup
111+
- **User Permissions**: Appropriate file permissions and user groups
112+
- **Path Integration**: Proper PATH and environment setup
113+
- **Documentation**: Manual pages and help system integration
114+
115+
### Update Reliability
116+
117+
#### Auto-Updater Requirements
118+
- **Atomic Updates**: Never leave system in broken state
119+
- **Rollback Support**: Ability to revert to previous version
120+
- **Configuration Preservation**: User settings survive updates
121+
- **Service Continuity**: Minimal downtime during updates
122+
- **Progress Indication**: Clear feedback during update process
123+
124+
#### Update Failure Scenarios
125+
- **Network Interruption**: Handle partial downloads gracefully
126+
- **Disk Space**: Verify adequate space before update
127+
- **Permission Issues**: Handle permission denied scenarios
128+
- **Service Conflicts**: Manage running services during update
129+
- **Dependency Conflicts**: Resolve version incompatibilities
130+
131+
### Performance Expectations
132+
133+
#### Binary Size Constraints
134+
| Component | Target Size | Current Size | Optimization Opportunities |
135+
|----------|-------------|--------------|---------------------------|
136+
| Server | < 15MB | 12.8MB | Strip symbols, optimize build |
137+
| TUI | < 8MB | 7.2MB | Reduce dependencies |
138+
| Desktop | < 50MB | 45.3MB | Asset optimization |
139+
| Docker | < 200MB | 180MB | Multi-stage builds |
140+
141+
#### Startup Performance
142+
- **Server Cold Start**: < 3 seconds to ready state
143+
- **TUI Response**: < 500ms initial interface
144+
- **Desktop Launch**: < 2 seconds to usable state
145+
- **Container Startup**: < 5 seconds to service ready
146+
- **Memory Usage**: Server < 100MB baseline, Desktop < 200MB
147+
148+
## Security Constraints
149+
150+
### Code Signing and Verification
151+
152+
#### Platform-Specific Requirements
153+
- **macOS**: Apple Developer certificate, notarization required
154+
- **Windows**: Authenticode certificate, SmartScreen compatibility
155+
- **Linux**: GPG signatures for packages, repository trust
156+
- **Docker**: Content trust, image signing support
157+
158+
#### Certificate Management
159+
- **Certificate Renewal**: Automated renewal before expiration
160+
- **Key Rotation**: Secure private key management practices
161+
- **Trust Chain**: Maintain valid certificate chains
162+
- **Revocation Handling**: Respond to certificate compromises
163+
164+
### Security Validation Requirements
165+
166+
#### Vulnerability Scanning
167+
- **Dependency Scanning**: Automated scanning of all dependencies
168+
- **Container Scanning**: Docker image vulnerability assessment
169+
- **Static Analysis**: Code security analysis tools integration
170+
- **Dynamic Analysis**: Runtime security testing
171+
172+
#### Integrity Verification
173+
- **Checksum Validation**: SHA256 for all release artifacts
174+
- **GPG Signatures**: Cryptographic verification of releases
175+
- **Blockchain Integration**: Immutable release records (future)
176+
- **Reproducible Builds**: Verifiable build process
177+
178+
## Performance Constraints
179+
180+
### Build Performance
181+
182+
#### Parallelization Limits
183+
- **Matrix Strategy**: Optimal parallel job distribution
184+
- **Dependency Caching**: Effective build cache utilization
185+
- **Artifact Distribution**: Efficient artifact sharing between jobs
186+
- **Resource Allocation**: Balanced resource usage across jobs
187+
188+
#### Build Time Targets
189+
| Component | Current Time | Target Time | Optimization Strategy |
190+
|-----------|--------------|-------------|----------------------|
191+
| Server Binary | 8 min | 5 min | Better caching |
192+
| Desktop App | 15 min | 10 min | Parallel builds |
193+
| Docker Image | 12 min | 8 min | Layer optimization |
194+
| Full Release | 45 min | 30 min | Pipeline optimization |
195+
196+
### Runtime Performance
197+
198+
#### Resource Utilization
199+
- **CPU Usage**: Efficient multi-core utilization
200+
- **Memory Management**: Minimal memory footprint
201+
- **I/O Performance**: Optimized file operations
202+
- **Network Efficiency**: Minimal bandwidth usage
203+
204+
#### Scalability Constraints
205+
- **Concurrent Users**: Support for multiple simultaneous connections
206+
- **Data Volume**: Handle growing index sizes efficiently
207+
- **Search Performance**: Sub-second response times
208+
- **Update Frequency**: Efficient incremental updates
209+
210+
## Compliance and Legal Constraints
211+
212+
### Open Source Compliance
213+
214+
#### License Requirements
215+
- **MIT/Apache 2.0**: Dual license compatibility
216+
- **Third-Party Licenses**: SPDX compliance for all dependencies
217+
- **Attribution**: Proper license notices and acknowledgments
218+
- **Source Availability**: Corresponding source code availability
219+
220+
#### Export Controls
221+
- **Cryptography**: Export control compliance for encryption features
222+
- **Country Restrictions**: Geographical distribution limitations
223+
- **Entity List Screening**: Restricted party screening processes
224+
225+
### Privacy and Data Protection
226+
227+
#### Data Handling Requirements
228+
- **User Data**: Minimal data collection and processing
229+
- **Local Storage**: No unnecessary data transmission
230+
- **Data Retention**: Appropriate data lifecycle management
231+
- **User Consent**: Clear privacy policies and consent mechanisms
232+
233+
## Operational Constraints
234+
235+
### Monitoring and Observability
236+
237+
#### Release Monitoring
238+
- **Download Metrics**: Track installation and update success rates
239+
- **Error Reporting**: Automated error collection and analysis
240+
- **Performance Metrics**: Real-time performance monitoring
241+
- **User Feedback**: In-app feedback collection mechanisms
242+
243+
#### Support Infrastructure
244+
- **Documentation**: Comprehensive installation and troubleshooting guides
245+
- **Community Support**: Issue tracking and response processes
246+
- **Knowledge Base**: Self-service support resources
247+
- **Escalation Process**: Clear support escalation procedures
248+
249+
### Maintenance Constraints
250+
251+
#### Long-Term Support
252+
- **Version Support**: Multi-version support strategy
253+
- **Security Updates**: Backport security fixes to older versions
254+
- **Deprecation Policy**: Clear component deprecation timelines
255+
- **Migration Paths**: Smooth upgrade paths between versions
256+
257+
This constraints analysis provides the foundation for understanding the boundaries and requirements that the release validation system must operate within. Each constraint represents a potential failure point that must be monitored and validated during the release process.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)