Add evaluate command: compare scoring methods across all runs#106
Merged
Conversation
thinktank evaluate re-scores all past runs with weighted, Copeland, and Borda methods, showing agreement rates and disagreements. Key finding from 21 runs: Copeland and Borda agree 86% of the time, while weighted disagrees with both ~40%. This suggests weighted scoring is the outlier — Copeland should likely be the default. Partial fix for #105 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Mar 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
thinktank evaluatere-scores all past runs with weighted, Copeland, and BordaKey findings from 21 real runs
Change type
Related issue
Partial fix for #105
How to test
Breaking changes
🤖 Generated with Claude Code