✨ Add "experimental" entry point for new APIs#1210
Merged
Conversation
commit: |
taras
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
We've been staging new API surface (context APIs, inspectable attributes,
api()decorator machinery) on thev4-1-alphabranch behind an./experimentalexport. Rather than land that alpha branch as a single mega-merge, we're peeling it apart into feature PRs againstv4.This first PR is the foundation: it wires up the
./experimentalentry point so subsequent PRs (context APIs, etc.) have somewhere to land without touching the stablemod.tssurface.Approach
deno.json— splitexportsinto.(mod) and./experimental(experimental); includeexperimental.tsin publish set.experimental.ts— empty for now; content lands with follow-up PRs.