Commit 0c1a9dc
sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue()
ops_dequeue() can race with finish_dispatch() and spuriously trigger the
"queued task must be in BPF scheduler's custody" warning.
ops_dequeue() snapshots p->scx.ops_state via atomic_long_read_acquire()
and then, in the SCX_OPSS_QUEUED arm, asserts that SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY
is set. The two reads are not atomic w.r.t. a concurrent
finish_dispatch() running on another CPU:
CPU 1 CPU 2
===== =====
dequeue_task_scx()
ops_dequeue()
opss = read_acquire(ops_state)
= SCX_OPSS_QUEUED
finish_dispatch()
cmpxchg ops_state:
SCX_OPSS_QUEUED -> SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING [succeeds]
dispatch_enqueue(SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL,
SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS)
call_task_dequeue()
p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(p->scx.flags &
SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY))
/* opss is stale: QUEUED,
* but task already claimed */
set_release(ops_state, SCX_OPSS_NONE)
The race has been observed via two distinct call chains: the most common
goes through sched_setaffinity(), a rarer variant through
sched_change_begin().
For SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL / SCX_DSQ_BYPASS, dispatch_enqueue() clears
SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY before clearing ops_state to SCX_OPSS_NONE
(intentional, to avoid concurrent non-atomic RMW of p->scx.flags against
ops_dequeue()). The window between those two writes is exactly what
ops_dequeue() observes as "QUEUED without custody".
The observed state is not actually inconsistent, it just means CPU 1 has
already claimed the task and the QUEUED value held by CPU 2 is stale.
Re-read ops_state in that case; the next read is guaranteed to return
SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING or SCX_OPSS_NONE, both of which exit the switch
cleanly. The retry is bounded: once IN_CUSTODY is cleared, ops_state has
already advanced past QUEUED for this dispatch cycle, and a fresh QUEUED
would require re-enqueue under p's rq lock, which CPU 2 holds.
Changes in v2:
- Use READ_ONCE() for p->scx.flags to ensure fresh reads and prevent
compiler reordering in the lockless path
- Add cpu_relax() to reduce power consumption and improve performance
during the spin-wait
- Use unlikely() to optimize branch prediction for the common case
- Expand the in-code comment to document the race condition and
bounded retry guarantee
Fixes: ebf1ccf ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics")
Suggested-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuele Mariotti <smariotti@disroot.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>1 parent 515e399 commit 0c1a9dc
1 file changed
Lines changed: 15 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
2078 | 2078 | | |
2079 | 2079 | | |
2080 | 2080 | | |
| 2081 | + | |
2081 | 2082 | | |
2082 | 2083 | | |
2083 | 2084 | | |
| |||
2091 | 2092 | | |
2092 | 2093 | | |
2093 | 2094 | | |
2094 | | - | |
2095 | | - | |
| 2095 | + | |
| 2096 | + | |
| 2097 | + | |
| 2098 | + | |
| 2099 | + | |
| 2100 | + | |
| 2101 | + | |
| 2102 | + | |
| 2103 | + | |
| 2104 | + | |
| 2105 | + | |
| 2106 | + | |
| 2107 | + | |
| 2108 | + | |
2096 | 2109 | | |
2097 | 2110 | | |
2098 | 2111 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments