Merge branch 'bpf-reject-negative-const-offsets-for-buffer-pointers'

Sun Jian says:

====================
bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers

Reject negative effective offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF
accesses. Calculate the effective access start using signed arithmetic
to prevent unsigned access-end accounting from wrapping, and cover both
load-time rejection and the raw tracepoint writable attach-time path.
---

Changes in v5:

- Simplify __check_buffer_access() to reject a negative effective start
  after confirming that var_off is constant. Validate the combined
  offset instead of rejecting negative instruction offsets separately.
  Drop the duplicate BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF check because pointer arithmetic
  already bounds constant offsets, and remove the redundant size < 0
  check.
- Switch the raw tracepoint writable attach tests from nbd_send_request
  to bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare_tp, avoiding the NBD configuration
  dependency and its false-pass condition.
- Split the attach coverage into named subtests and require
  bpf_raw_tracepoint_open() to return -EINVAL.
- Add verifier coverage for a negative constant PTR_TO_BUF offset.

Changes in v4:

- Correct the Fixes tag to point to 022ac07, where pointer offsets
  were folded into reg->var_off.
- Drop the end > U32_MAX check, which is unreachable after bounding const
  var_off with BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF while keeping instruction offsets and
  access sizes bounded.

Changes in v3:

- Check constant var_off against +/-BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF before computing
  the effective access range, matching the existing verifier pointer
  offset convention.
- Keep explicit rejection of negative instruction offsets and keep
  bounded negative constant var_off valid when the effective offset is
  non-negative.

Changes in v2:

- Split the kernel fix and selftests into separate patches.
- Add an attach-time raw tracepoint writable test that exercises
  max_tp_access against nbd_send_request's writable size.
- Adjust selftest formatting to use the 100 character line width.

Tested:

- ./test_progs -v -t verifier_raw_tp_writable
- ./test_progs -v -t verifier_ptr_to_buf
- ./test_progs -v -t raw_tp_writable_reject_bad_access
- ./test_progs -v -t raw_tp_writable_test_run

v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260708090151.151729-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260708040715.116680-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260707060804.93561-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260703035137.109608-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260714093846.18159-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

Author: eddyz87

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

@@ -5326,14 +5326,11 @@ static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 static int __check_buffer_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				 const char *buf_info,
 				 const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
-				 argno_t argno, int off, int size)
+				 argno_t argno, int off, int size,
+				 u32 *access_end)
 {
-	if (off < 0) {
-		verbose(env,
-			"%s invalid %s buffer access: off=%d, size=%d\n",
-			reg_arg_name(env, argno), buf_info, off, size);
-		return -EACCES;
-	}
+	s64 start;
+
 	if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
 		char tn_buf[48];
 
@@ -5344,21 +5341,30 @@ static int __check_buffer_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
+	start = (s64)reg->var_off.value + off;
+	if (start < 0) {
+		verbose(env,
+			"%s invalid negative %s buffer offset: off=%d, var_off=%lld\n",
+			reg_arg_name(env, argno), buf_info, off, (s64)reg->var_off.value);
+		return -EACCES;
+	}
+
+	*access_end = start + size;
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int check_tp_buffer_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				  const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
 				  argno_t argno, int off, int size)
 {
+	u32 access_end;
 	int err;
 
-	err = __check_buffer_access(env, "tracepoint", reg, argno, off, size);
+	err = __check_buffer_access(env, "tracepoint", reg, argno, off, size, &access_end);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	env->prog->aux->max_tp_access = max(reg->var_off.value + off + size,
-					    env->prog->aux->max_tp_access);
+	env->prog->aux->max_tp_access = max(access_end, env->prog->aux->max_tp_access);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -5370,13 +5376,14 @@ static int check_buffer_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			       u32 *max_access)
 {
 	const char *buf_info = type_is_rdonly_mem(reg->type) ? "rdonly" : "rdwr";
+	u32 access_end;
 	int err;
 
-	err = __check_buffer_access(env, buf_info, reg, argno, off, size);
+	err = __check_buffer_access(env, buf_info, reg, argno, off, size, &access_end);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	*max_access = max(reg->var_off.value + off + size, *max_access);
+	*max_access = max(access_end, *max_access);
 
 	return 0;
 }

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_bad_access.c

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "bpf_util.h"
+
+static void check_attach_reject(const struct bpf_insn *program, size_t prog_len)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts);
+	char error[4096];
+	int bpf_fd, tp_fd;
+
+	opts.log_level = 2;
+	opts.log_buf = error;
+	opts.log_size = sizeof(error);
+
+	bpf_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, NULL, "GPL v2",
+			       program, prog_len, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(bpf_fd, 0, "prog_load"))
+		return;
+
+	tp_fd = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open("bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare_tp", bpf_fd);
+	ASSERT_EQ(tp_fd, -EINVAL, "bpf_raw_tracepoint_open");
+	if (tp_fd >= 0)
+		close(tp_fd);
+
+	close(bpf_fd);
+}
+
+void test_raw_tp_writable_reject_bad_access(void)
+{
+	const struct bpf_insn program[] = {
+		/* r6 is our tp buffer */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+		/* one byte beyond the end of the writable context */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6,
+			    sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx)),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	};
+
+	const struct bpf_insn negative_var_off_program[] = {
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+		/* make var_off negative, but keep the effective access offset non-negative */
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+		/* one byte beyond the end of the writable context */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6,
+			    sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx) + 8),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	};
+
+	if (test__start_subtest("past_end"))
+		check_attach_reject(program, ARRAY_SIZE(program));
+
+	if (test__start_subtest("negative_var_off_past_end"))
+		check_attach_reject(negative_var_off_program,
+				    ARRAY_SIZE(negative_var_off_program));
+}

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_writable_reject_nbd_invalid.c

@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
 #include "verifier_precision.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_prevent_map_lookup.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_private_stack.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_ptr_to_buf.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_raw_stack.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_raw_tp_writable.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_reg_equal.skel.h"
@@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ void test_verifier_or_jmp32_k(void)           { RUN(verifier_or_jmp32_k); }
 void test_verifier_precision(void)            { RUN(verifier_precision); }
 void test_verifier_prevent_map_lookup(void)   { RUN(verifier_prevent_map_lookup); }
 void test_verifier_private_stack(void)        { RUN(verifier_private_stack); }
+void test_verifier_ptr_to_buf(void)           { RUN(verifier_ptr_to_buf); }
 void test_verifier_raw_stack(void)            { RUN(verifier_raw_stack); }
 void test_verifier_raw_tp_writable(void)      { RUN(verifier_raw_tp_writable); }
 void test_verifier_reg_equal(void)            { RUN(verifier_reg_equal); }

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+__description("PTR_TO_BUF: reject negative const offset")
+__failure
+__msg("invalid negative rdwr buffer offset")
+__naked void ptr_to_buf_reject_negative_const_offset(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("r0 = 0;					\
+	 r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[value_off]);			\
+	 if r2 == 0 goto l0_%=;					\
+	 r2 += -8;						\
+	 r0 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0);					\
+l0_%=:								\
+	 exit;							\
+	"
+	:
+	: __imm_const(value_off,
+		      offsetof(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem, value))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ptr_to_buf.c

@@ -47,4 +47,20 @@ l0_%=:	/* shift the buffer pointer to a variable location */\
 	: __clobber_all);
 }
 
+SEC("raw_tracepoint.w")
+__description("raw_tracepoint_writable: reject negative const offset")
+__failure
+__msg("invalid negative tracepoint buffer offset")
+__naked void tracepoint_writable_reject_negative_const_offset(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);				\
+	r6 += -8;					\
+	r0 = *(u64 *)(r6 + 0);				\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	:
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";