Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (32 loc) · 1.97 KB

File metadata and controls

51 lines (32 loc) · 1.97 KB

Code of Conduct

Our standard

Tigrcorn is a technical project with a documentation-heavy and evidence-heavy workflow. We expect participants to be respectful, specific, and accountable in technical discussion and collaboration.

Expected behavior

  • discuss code, docs, tests, and evidence directly and in good faith
  • critique ideas and changes without attacking people
  • be honest about uncertainty, blockers, regressions, and scope boundaries
  • respect the repository's documented governance and mutability rules
  • help keep review threads focused, actionable, and evidence-based

Unacceptable behavior

  • harassment, intimidation, or discrimination
  • abusive language or personal attacks
  • bad-faith misrepresentation of test results, release status, or certification status
  • deliberately ignoring documented immutable boundaries or release-root rules
  • publishing private information without permission

Scope

This code of conduct applies to project spaces, including repository issues, pull requests, discussions, documentation review, and other project communication channels connected to Tigrcorn.

Reporting

If you experience or witness behavior that violates this code of conduct, contact the current maintainer of record or use the hosting platform's private reporting tools where available.

Current package metadata maintainer contact:

  • Jacob Stewart
  • jacob@swarmauri.com

Include links, screenshots, or other concrete context when possible.

Response and enforcement

Project maintainers may take any action they consider appropriate, including:

  • asking for a change in behavior
  • moderating or removing comments
  • closing discussions
  • restricting or removing participation

The response should be proportional to the severity and pattern of behavior.

Good-faith participation

Technical disagreement is expected. Good-faith disagreement, clear evidence, and direct review comments are welcome. The goal is a project culture that is rigorous without becoming hostile.