Conversation
tninja
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Update the change classifier so documentation-only requests are treated as non-code changes instead of code changes.
The classifier guidance was too broad and could treat generic update-style requests as code work even when the request was only about documentation. That makes the package choose the wrong path for docs-oriented tasks.
This change narrows the prompt so
CODE_CHANGEis reserved for program code and test code, and it explicitly calls out documentation and other non-program-code work as non-code. I also added a regression test that covers a documentation-only prompt so the classifier keeps this behavior.Verification
test/test_ai-code.el