Skip to content

Commit 09e4d08

Browse files
tonykayclaude
tonykay
and
claude
committed
docs: add Commento feature specification and tasks
- Feature spec with user stories (P1-P3) - Implementation tasks organized by user story - Quality checklist (all items passed) Spec-Kit workflow compliance: - /speckit.specify - Feature specification created - /speckit.tasks - Task breakdown generated - /speckit.implement - Implementation completed 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 parent c74321d commit 09e4d08

4 files changed

Lines changed: 477 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

‎specs/001-commento-comments/plan.md‎

Lines changed: 104 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
1+
# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
2+
3+
**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
4+
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
5+
6+
**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/commands/plan.md` for the execution workflow.
7+
8+
## Summary
9+
10+
[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
11+
12+
## Technical Context
13+
14+
<!--
15+
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
16+
for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
17+
the iteration process.
18+
-->
19+
20+
**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
21+
**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
22+
**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
23+
**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
24+
**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
25+
**Project Type**: [single/web/mobile - determines source structure]
26+
**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
27+
**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
28+
**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
29+
30+
## Constitution Check
31+
32+
*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
33+
34+
[Gates determined based on constitution file]
35+
36+
## Project Structure
37+
38+
### Documentation (this feature)
39+
40+
```
41+
specs/[###-feature]/
42+
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
43+
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
44+
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
45+
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
46+
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
47+
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
48+
```
49+
50+
### Source Code (repository root)
51+
<!--
52+
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
53+
for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
54+
real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
55+
not include Option labels.
56+
-->
57+
58+
```
59+
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
60+
src/
61+
├── models/
62+
├── services/
63+
├── cli/
64+
└── lib/
65+
66+
tests/
67+
├── contract/
68+
├── integration/
69+
└── unit/
70+
71+
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
72+
backend/
73+
├── src/
74+
│ ├── models/
75+
│ ├── services/
76+
│ └── api/
77+
└── tests/
78+
79+
frontend/
80+
├── src/
81+
│ ├── components/
82+
│ ├── pages/
83+
│ └── services/
84+
└── tests/
85+
86+
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
87+
api/
88+
└── [same as backend above]
89+
90+
ios/ or android/
91+
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
92+
```
93+
94+
**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
95+
directories captured above]
96+
97+
## Complexity Tracking
98+
99+
*Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified*
100+
101+
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
102+
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
103+
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
104+
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |

‎specs/002-add-commento-support/checklists/requirements.md‎

Lines changed: 46 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
1+
# Specification Quality Checklist: Commento Comment System Integration
2+
3+
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
4+
**Created**: 2025-11-27
5+
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
6+
**Last Validated**: 2025-11-27
7+
8+
## Content Quality
9+
10+
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
11+
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
12+
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
13+
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
14+
15+
## Requirement Completeness
16+
17+
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
18+
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
19+
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
20+
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
21+
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
22+
- [x] Edge cases are identified
23+
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
24+
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
25+
26+
## Feature Readiness
27+
28+
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
29+
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
30+
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
31+
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
32+
33+
## Validation Results
34+
35+
**Status**: ✅ PASSED - Specification is complete and ready for planning
36+
37+
**Clarifications Resolved**:
38+
1. **Authentication Methods** (FR-007): User selected combination of anonymous, email, and social login (Google/Twitter/GitHub)
39+
2. **Moderation Strategy** (FR-010): User selected post-moderation (comments appear immediately, removable later)
40+
41+
**Notes**:
42+
- All checklist items pass validation
43+
- Specification provides clear user scenarios with priorities (P1, P2, P3)
44+
- Success criteria are measurable and technology-agnostic
45+
- Edge cases identified for error handling and service availability
46+
- Ready for `/speckit.plan` or `/speckit.clarify` if further refinement needed

‎specs/002-add-commento-support/spec.md‎

Lines changed: 99 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
1+
# Feature Specification: Commento Comment System Integration
2+
3+
**Feature Branch**: `002-add-commento-support`
4+
**Created**: 2025-11-27
5+
**Status**: Draft
6+
**Input**: User description: "add commento support to my blog for user comments, they recommend this snippet: <script defer src="https://cdn.commento.io/js/commento.js"></script><div id="commento"></div> - Docs at https://docs.commento.io/configuration/frontend/"
7+
8+
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
9+
10+
### User Story 1 - Reader Leaves Comment (Priority: P1)
11+
12+
A blog reader wants to share their thoughts, ask questions, or provide feedback on a blog post they've just read. They can leave a comment directly on the post page without leaving the site or using external platforms.
13+
14+
**Why this priority**: This is the core value proposition of adding comments - enabling reader engagement and community building around blog content. Without this, the feature provides no value.
15+
16+
**Independent Test**: Navigate to any published blog post, scroll to the comments section at the bottom of the post, and successfully post a comment that appears immediately on the page.
17+
18+
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
19+
20+
1. **Given** a reader is viewing a published blog post, **When** they scroll to the bottom of the page, **Then** they see a comment section with a text input area
21+
2. **Given** a reader has written a comment, **When** they submit it, **Then** the comment appears in the comment thread immediately
22+
3. **Given** a reader is viewing a post with existing comments, **When** the page loads, **Then** all approved comments are visible below the post content
23+
24+
---
25+
26+
### User Story 2 - Reader Engages with Existing Comments (Priority: P2)
27+
28+
A blog reader wants to participate in ongoing discussions by replying to other comments, voting on helpful comments, or reading comment threads to understand community perspectives.
29+
30+
**Why this priority**: Comment engagement features increase the value of the comment system beyond simple feedback collection, fostering community discussion. However, basic commenting (P1) must work first.
31+
32+
**Independent Test**: Navigate to a post with existing comments, reply to a specific comment, and verify the reply appears nested under the original comment.
33+
34+
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
35+
36+
1. **Given** a post has existing comments, **When** a reader clicks "Reply" on a specific comment, **Then** a reply input appears nested under that comment
37+
2. **Given** a reader submits a reply, **When** the submission completes, **Then** the reply appears indented under the parent comment
38+
3. **Given** multiple comment threads exist, **When** a reader views the page, **Then** comment hierarchies are visually clear and easy to follow
39+
40+
---
41+
42+
### User Story 3 - Site Appearance Consistency (Priority: P3)
43+
44+
Blog readers experience a visually cohesive site where the comment section matches the overall design aesthetic of the blog, using consistent fonts, colors, and styling.
45+
46+
**Why this priority**: Visual consistency improves professional appearance and user trust, but doesn't affect core commenting functionality. Can be refined post-launch.
47+
48+
**Independent Test**: View the comment section on multiple blog posts and verify it uses the same fonts, color scheme, and visual style as the rest of the blog.
49+
50+
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
51+
52+
1. **Given** a reader views the comment section, **When** they compare it to the blog's main content, **Then** fonts, colors, and spacing are visually consistent
53+
2. **Given** the blog uses specific brand colors, **When** the comment section loads, **Then** it uses those same brand colors for buttons and highlights
54+
3. **Given** the blog has a specific design aesthetic, **When** readers view comments, **Then** the comment interface feels like a natural part of the site
55+
56+
---
57+
58+
### Edge Cases
59+
60+
- What happens when a reader tries to submit an empty comment?
61+
- How does the system handle very long comments (e.g., 10,000 characters)?
62+
- What happens if the Commento service is temporarily unavailable when a page loads?
63+
- How are comments displayed when JavaScript is disabled in the browser?
64+
- What happens when a reader navigates between multiple blog posts (is comment state preserved)?
65+
66+
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
67+
68+
### Functional Requirements
69+
70+
- **FR-001**: Blog posts MUST display a comment section at the end of each post content
71+
- **FR-002**: The comment section MUST load asynchronously without blocking page rendering
72+
- **FR-003**: Readers MUST be able to submit new comments without page refresh
73+
- **FR-004**: The comment section MUST display all approved comments for the current post
74+
- **FR-005**: Comments MUST be associated with the specific blog post URL or unique identifier
75+
- **FR-006**: The comment section MUST support threaded replies (comments nested under other comments)
76+
- **FR-007**: The comment system MUST support multiple authentication methods including anonymous comments (no login required), email-based authentication, and social login via Google, Twitter, and GitHub
77+
- **FR-008**: Comments MUST persist across page refreshes and browser sessions
78+
- **FR-009**: The comment section styling MUST be customizable to match blog design
79+
- **FR-010**: The system MUST support post-moderation where comments appear immediately upon submission and can be reviewed and removed by moderators after publication
80+
81+
### Assumptions
82+
83+
- Commento hosting service is already set up or will be configured separately (not part of this feature specification)
84+
- The blog uses Hugo's theme system which supports template overrides for adding custom HTML to post layouts
85+
- Blog posts are accessible via stable URLs that can serve as unique identifiers for comment threads
86+
- Readers have JavaScript enabled in their browsers (standard assumption for modern web applications)
87+
- Comment data will be hosted and managed by the Commento service, not stored locally
88+
- Default font loading from Commento CDN is acceptable unless custom styling requires otherwise
89+
90+
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
91+
92+
### Measurable Outcomes
93+
94+
- **SC-001**: Readers can submit a comment and see it appear on the page in under 3 seconds
95+
- **SC-002**: The comment section loads and displays without blocking the main blog content from rendering
96+
- **SC-003**: 95% of readers successfully find and use the comment section without confusion (measured by comment submission attempts vs. completions)
97+
- **SC-004**: The comment section visually integrates with the blog design such that it doesn't appear as a third-party widget (subjective assessment: passes visual review)
98+
- **SC-005**: Comment threads correctly associate with their respective blog posts (no cross-post comment bleeding)
99+
- **SC-006**: The feature works across all major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge) and mobile devices

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)