You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.MD
+1Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ An awesome collection of articles, papers, conferences, guides, and tools relati
55
55
-[HoneyTrap: Deceiving Large Language Model Attackers to Honeypot Traps with Resilient Multi-Agent Defense](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04034) (2026) - proposes a deceptive LLM defense framework with multi-agent coordination, plus a progressive jailbreak dataset and new metrics for measuring misdirection and attacker cost.
56
56
-[Measuring the Efficacy of Cyber Deception](https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.176834017.70221537) (2026) - examines how to measure cyber deception effectiveness by reviewing existing evaluation approaches and proposing new metrics and frameworks to assess deceptive tactics in modern, AI-augmented threat environments.
57
57
-[Q-Cowrie: Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Honeypot Deception](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10207-026-01221-5) (2026) - presents “Q-Cowrie,” a reinforcement learning-enhanced Cowrie honeypot that models attacker decisions with an MDP and adapts responses during attacker interaction.
58
+
-[Deception and Detection: Why Artificial Intelligence Empowers Cyber Defense over Offense](https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/50/3/86/135683/Deception-and-Detection-Why-Artificial) (2026) - argues that AI automation benefits cyber defense more than offense, widening an offense-defense automation gap as stakes increase.
58
59
59
60
### Code Repositories
60
61
-[Evaluating Deception and Moving Target Defense with Network Attack Simulation](https://github.com/dfki-in-sec/NASIM-MTD)
0 commit comments