ornament:0.1.0

[thuiop]

I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

Description: this is a Typst port of the pgfornament LaTeX package, using only standard library functions. The primary entry point is the ornament function, which simply draws the ornament based on embedded .pgf files; it features easy resizing, mirroring and coloring.

Note: I think I have checked all the conditions, with a caveat on the first one. I went with ornament to mirror the name of the LaTeX package, but it might be too general. Let me know if that is the case and I will figure out another one.

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

• selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
• added a typst.toml file with all required keys
• added a README.md with documentation for my package
• have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md
• tested my package locally on my system and it worked
• excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE

[saecki]

Thanks for this package!

[saecki]

This name is a little too descriptive. We try to avoid canonical names so multiple packages serving the same purpose can coexist without one having an unfair advantage. Could you change the name to something else, for example by adding a non-descriptive prefix or suffix, or ideally by coming up with something a little more creative? See our naming rules

[thuiop]

Yes, this is what I was worried about. Would something like "ornamentalyst" work?