feat: Clarify scope of file permissions fix in template.go

[Copilot]

The review comment about file permissions in template.go has already been addressed. The code now preserves existing file permissions when updating files, defaulting to 0644 for new files instead of the overly restrictive 0600.

Current implementation (lines 271-278):

// Determine file permissions: preserve existing if possible, else default to 0644
perm := os.FileMode(0644)
if fi, err := os.Stat(filePath); err == nil {
    perm = fi.Mode().Perm()
}

// Write back
if err := os.WriteFile(filePath, []byte(newContent), perm); err != nil {
    return changedCount, fmt.Errorf("failed to write %s: %w", relPath, err)
}

This change prevents permission issues with Git commits and tool access to generated files while maintaining security for existing files with restricted permissions.

Note: Cannot create new PRs programmatically - awaiting clarification on whether other unresolved review comments should be addressed in this branch.

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[devopsbuddyapp]

🚫 Pull Request Review - Invalid Title

This pull request title doesn't match the required format.

Current title: [WIP] Enhance cluster-bootstrap CLI with new commands and validation

Required format: Must start with a [semantic-release commit type] followed by an optional scope and a short description.

Allowed types:

• feat, fix, chore, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, revert

Examples:

• feat: add user login
• fix(auth): handle token expiration
• docs(readme): update contributing section
• refactor(core): simplify logic

To fix this:

1. Update the PR title to follow the required format
2. Once updated, this review will be automatically resolved

This helps enforce consistent PR and commit naming conventions that integrate with semantic-release.

[devopsbuddyapp]

🚫 Pull Request Review - Invalid Title

This pull request title doesn't match the required format.

Current title: Clarify scope of file permissions fix in template.go

Required format: Must start with a [semantic-release commit type] followed by an optional scope and a short description.

Allowed types:

• feat, fix, chore, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, revert

Examples:

• feat: add user login
• fix(auth): handle token expiration
• docs(readme): update contributing section
• refactor(core): simplify logic

To fix this:

1. Update the PR title to follow the required format
2. Once updated, this review will be automatically resolved

This helps enforce consistent PR and commit naming conventions that integrate with semantic-release.

✅ PR title is now valid - review dismissed automatically