uucore: upgrade md-5, sha1, sha2, sha3, digest to latest versions

[gabrielhnf]

Fixes #12361

Upgrades the hash-related crates to their latest versions

• Bumped md-5 to 0.11.0, sha1 to 0.11.0, sha2 to 0.11.0, sha3 to 0.12.0, digest to 0.11.0
• Added shake 0.1.0 since Shake128/Shake256 were moved out of sha3 into a separate crate in 0.12.0
• Updated impl_digest_common to use finalize_reset instead of finalize_into_reset, as that was one of the breaking changes

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/io-errors (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/retry (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/tail/pipe-f is now being skipped but was previously passing.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 312 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	cksum_sha224	1.8 s	1.6 s	+10.54%
❌	Simulation	cksum_sha3	1.8 s	1.9 s	-3.39%
❌	Simulation	cksum_shake256	1.9 s	1.9 s	-3.31%
⚡	Simulation	cksum_sha2	1.8 s	1.6 s	+10.54%
❌	Simulation	cksum_shake128	1.5 s	1.6 s	-3.29%
⚡	Simulation	cksum_sha256	1.8 s	1.6 s	+10.54%
❌	Simulation	cksum_md5	320.9 ms	335.1 ms	-4.22%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing gabrielhnf:update-digest-dependent-crates (3a9e69c) with main (f28d828)}

Footnotes

1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[xtqqczze]

Since crc-fast still depends on digest v0.10.7, could you please revert the bump to 1.10.0, along with the MSRV increase?

[gabrielhnf]

Downgrading crc-fast to 1.5.0 makes cargo resolve it as 1.9.0 with cargo update. Is this acceptable?

[xtqqczze]

Yes, this is fine. Cargo.toml specifies the minimum compatible version, so if cargo update resolves crc-fast to 1.9.0, that’s expected and acceptable.

[cakebaker]

Thanks for your PR!