feat(open-responses): add option to pass reasoning summary for OpenResponses#14115
Merged
Conversation
tigent
Bot
added
ai/provider
aayush-kapoor
added
the
backport
gr2m
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2026
ghost
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2026
ghost
mentioned this pull request
ghost
removed
the
backport
|
|
|
🚀 Published in:
|
aayush-kapoor
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
…for OpenResponses (#14208) This is an automated backport of #14115 to the release-v6.0 branch. FYI @aayush-kapoor This backport has conflicts that need to be resolved manually. ### `git cherry-pick` output ``` Auto-merging packages/open-responses/src/open-responses-provider.ts Auto-merging packages/open-responses/src/responses/open-responses-language-model.test.ts CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in packages/open-responses/src/responses/open-responses-language-model.test.ts Auto-merging packages/open-responses/src/responses/open-responses-language-model.ts CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in packages/open-responses/src/responses/open-responses-language-model.ts error: could not apply e69a836... feat(open-responses): add option to pass reasoning summary for OpenResponses (#14115) hint: After resolving the conflicts, mark them with hint: "git add/rm <pathspec>", then run hint: "git cherry-pick --continue". hint: You can instead skip this commit with "git cherry-pick --skip". hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git cherry-pick", hint: run "git cherry-pick --abort". hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false" ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Aayush Kapoor <83492835+aayush-kapoor@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aayush Kapoor <aayushkapoor34@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
#13439
the open-responses provider did not parse the providerOptions passed for a model and was ignoring options such as
reasoning.summary. it already had the api structure setup -ReasoningParambut wasn'tthe original issue talks about AI SDK not parsing the reasoning effort but reasoning was added as a top level param and was taken care of
Summary
parseProviderOptionsfunction to parse the provider options passed along with an open-responses providercreateOpenResponsesso that provider option namespace uses the same value (and doesn't pass if not the same)Manual Verification
verified by running the example
examples/ai-functions/src/generate-text/open-responses/lmstudio-reasoning.tsChecklist
pnpm changesetin the project root)Related Issues
fixes #13439