Skip to content

[e2e] Fix step source maps assertion for Vercel production #1672

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
VaguelySerious merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

[e2e] Fix step source maps assertion for Vercel production #1672

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/cool-cups-greet.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
---
---
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions packages/core/e2e/utils.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,12 +56,9 @@ export function hasStepSourceMaps(): boolean {
return false;
}

// Vercel production builds don't support step source maps
if (process.env.WORKFLOW_VERCEL_ENV === 'production') {
return false;
}

// Vercel preview builds have proper source maps for all other frameworks, EXCEPT sveltekit
// Vercel deployments (both production and preview) have proper source maps
// for all frameworks EXCEPT sveltekit, thanks to ESM step bundles with
// inline source maps.
if (!isLocalDeployment()) {
return appName !== 'sveltekit';
}
Expand Down
Loading