skip[fuzz]: new unstable encodings fuzzer run

[joseph-isaacs]

Add a new runner target for array_ops with unstable encodings to ensure we know that these bugs are not necessarily stable encodings

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 16.44%

⚡ 9 improved benchmarks
❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1001 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]	443 µs	397 µs	+11.59%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768]	139.2 µs	125.1 µs	+11.27%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]	110.2 µs	95.6 µs	+15.28%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]	235.4 µs	176.3 µs	+33.48%
❌	Simulation	patched_take_10k_contiguous_not_patches	247.8 µs	278.5 µs	-11.01%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]	141.9 µs	112.2 µs	+26.43%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]	172.4 µs	143.3 µs	+20.31%
⚡	Simulation	old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]	323.7 µs	293 µs	+10.46%
❌	Simulation	take_10k_dispersed	241.8 µs	286.7 µs	-15.67%
❌	Simulation	patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches	247.7 µs	278.2 µs	-10.98%
❌	Simulation	take_10k_first_chunk_only	228 µs	272.9 µs	-16.44%
⚡	Simulation	new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]	146.5 µs	124.5 µs	+17.75%
❌	Simulation	patched_take_10k_random	259.5 µs	289.9 µs	-10.49%
⚡	Simulation	old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]	535.5 µs	474 µs	+12.97%
❌	Simulation	true_count_arrow_buffer[128]	888.6 ns	1,005.3 ns	-11.61%

---

_{Comparing ji/fuzzer-non-unstable (d91c608) with develop (b79b7d6)}

Footnotes

1. 1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩