skip[fuzz]: new unstable encodings fuzzer run by joseph-isaacs · Pull Request #7123 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Regression: -16.44%

⚡ 9 improved benchmarks
❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1001 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	443 µs	397 µs	+11.59%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768]`	139.2 µs	125.1 µs	+11.27%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]`	110.2 µs	95.6 µs	+15.28%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	235.4 µs	176.3 µs	+33.48%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_not_patches`	247.8 µs	278.5 µs	-11.01%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	141.9 µs	112.2 µs	+26.43%
⚡	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	172.4 µs	143.3 µs	+20.31%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	323.7 µs	293 µs	+10.46%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_dispersed`	241.8 µs	286.7 µs	-15.67%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches`	247.7 µs	278.2 µs	-10.98%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_first_chunk_only`	228 µs	272.9 µs	-16.44%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]`	146.5 µs	124.5 µs	+17.75%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_random`	259.5 µs	289.9 µs	-10.49%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	535.5 µs	474 µs	+12.97%
❌	Simulation	`true_count_arrow_buffer[128]`	888.6 ns	1,005.3 ns	-11.61%

_{Comparing ji/fuzzer-non-unstable (d91c608) with develop (b79b7d6)}

1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩