expr test #7258

Performance Regression: -23.78%

❌ 26 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1096 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1530 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-23.61%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.1)]`	251.7 µs	324.6 µs	-22.48%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.5)]`	1.8 ms	2.2 ms	-16.9%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 1.0)]`	3.5 ms	4.3 ms	-17.08%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.05)]`	135.8 µs	172.4 µs	-21.22%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.1)]`	272.7 µs	345.6 µs	-21.12%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.05)]`	217 µs	253.6 µs	-14.43%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)]`	170.9 µs	202 µs	-15.4%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.5 ms	1.8 ms	-16.98%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.1)]`	391.4 µs	464.4 µs	-15.72%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 1.0)]`	2.5 ms	3.3 ms	-22.31%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.3 ms	1.6 ms	-22.16%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 1.0)]`	2.3 ms	3.1 ms	-23.78%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.05)]`	147.2 µs	183.8 µs	-19.9%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)]`	184 µs	215.1 µs	-14.45%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.6 ms	1.9 ms	-15.94%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)]`	3 ms	3.6 ms	-17.09%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.1, 0.05)]`	250.2 µs	281.3 µs	-11.06%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 1.0)]`	3.2 ms	3.9 ms	-16.04%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)]`	320 µs	382 µs	-16.24%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing os/expr-hack (31586f3) with develop (13937c0)}

1530 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩