feat: `First` `Last` #7313

Performance Gate Passed

⚡ 24 improved benchmarks
✅ 1098 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1530 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 1.0)]`	3.1 ms	2.3 ms	+31.26%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.1)]`	320.1 µs	246.9 µs	+29.65%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.5 ms	1.2 ms	+31.05%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.6 ms	1.3 ms	+28.59%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.05)]`	249 µs	212.2 µs	+17.34%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.1)]`	459.5 µs	386.3 µs	+18.95%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.05)]`	179.2 µs	142.4 µs	+25.83%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.05)]`	168.1 µs	131.4 µs	+28%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.8 ms	1.5 ms	+20.54%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.5)]`	2.2 ms	1.8 ms	+20.42%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 1.0)]`	3.3 ms	2.5 ms	+28.78%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.1)]`	340.8 µs	267.7 µs	+27.35%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)]`	376.6 µs	314.4 µs	+19.8%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 1.0)]`	4.3 ms	3.5 ms	+20.65%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)]`	3.6 ms	3 ms	+20.66%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)]`	209.9 µs	178.6 µs	+17.52%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)]`	197 µs	165.7 µs	+18.89%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.9 ms	1.6 ms	+19.04%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.1, 0.05)]`	275.8 µs	244.5 µs	+12.78%
⚡	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.1)]`	401 µs	338.8 µs	+18.37%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing db/first-last (fbf570a) with develop (951bdf9)}

1530 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩