Field pruning in nested struct scan#7327
Open
brancz wants to merge 2 commits intovortex-data:developfrom
Open
Conversation
connortsui20
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
Comment on lines
+63
to
+67
| let can_fast_path = match target_fields { | ||
| None => true, | ||
| Some(fields) => fields.len() >= n_struct_fields, | ||
| }; | ||
| if can_fast_path { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you can use is_none_or here
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I'm trying to have scans read only a subset of a nested struct. It's of the shape:
List<Struct<a: Utf8, b: Int64>, so I can't use regular projections in DataFusion, since those only support indices. This is my best attempt, combined with an optimizer rule that modifies the table schema to the subset under certain circumstances.Testing
Added a unit test that fails without the second commit.
Notes
Happy to think through other approaches to this, this was just the first thing that I came up with.