Fix semantic merge conflict between session serde and foreign encodings #7362

Performance Regression: -23.82%

❌ 24 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1098 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1530 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.1)]`	247.1 µs	320.2 µs	-22.84%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-23.69%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.05)]`	131.5 µs	168.3 µs	-21.82%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.5)]`	1.8 ms	2.2 ms	-16.94%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.05)]`	142.6 µs	179.3 µs	-20.48%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 1.0)]`	2.3 ms	3.1 ms	-23.82%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.3 ms	1.6 ms	-22.23%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.5 ms	1.8 ms	-17.04%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)]`	165.9 µs	197.1 µs	-15.85%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)]`	178.8 µs	210 µs	-14.88%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.1)]`	386.5 µs	459.6 µs	-15.91%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)]`	314.5 µs	376.7 µs	-16.51%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 1.0)]`	2.5 ms	3.3 ms	-22.35%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)]`	3 ms	3.6 ms	-17.12%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.05)]`	212.4 µs	249.2 µs	-14.74%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.1)]`	339 µs	401.2 µs	-15.51%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.6 ms	1.9 ms	-15.99%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.1)]`	267.8 µs	341 µs	-21.45%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 1.0)]`	3.5 ms	4.3 ms	-17.1%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 1.0)]`	3.2 ms	3.9 ms	-16.06%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing rk/fmt (e791202) with develop (a30de02)²}

1530 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (84e4dc0) during the generation of this report, so a30de02 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩