perf: correctly try execute parent in the iterative child execute loop #7386
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Apr 16, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚡ 9 improved benchmarks
✅ 1154 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1457 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_map[(0.1, 0.5)] |
1,154.5 µs | 967.5 µs | +19.33% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_map[(0.1, 1.0)] |
2 ms | 1.6 ms | +19.38% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_dispersed |
316 µs | 286.1 µs | +10.45% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_contiguous_not_patches |
258.4 µs | 228.5 µs | +13.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches |
258.1 µs | 228.1 µs | +13.14% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_10k_dispersed |
284.4 µs | 239.8 µs | +18.59% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_first_chunk_only |
302 µs | 272.1 µs | +11.01% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_random |
270.3 µs | 240.3 µs | +12.51% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_10k_first_chunk_only |
270.6 µs | 226 µs | +19.72% |
Comparing ji/fix-up-execute (082195f) with develop (91b4c75)
Footnotes
-
1457 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading