Clean up `vortex-tensor` #7525

Performance Regression: -18.79%

❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1152 untouched benchmarks
🆕 5 new benchmarks
⏩ 1462 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]`	284.8 µs	350.7 µs	-18.79%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches`	228.1 µs	258.2 µs	-11.64%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_random`	240.4 µs	270.4 µs	-11.12%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_first_chunk_only`	225.9 µs	270.9 µs	-16.59%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_10k_contiguous_not_patches`	228.5 µs	258.6 µs	-11.62%
❌	Simulation	`take_10k_dispersed`	239.8 µs	284.7 µs	-15.77%
🆕	Simulation	`turboquant_encode_dim768_4bit`	N/A	53 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`turboquant_encode_dim128_4bit`	N/A	6.7 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`turboquant_encode_dim1024_4bit`	N/A	53.5 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`turboquant_encode_dim1024_2bit`	N/A	48.3 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`turboquant_encode_dim1024_8bit`	N/A	63.7 ms	N/A

_{Comparing ct/cleanup-tensor (d7f386c) with develop (4135209)²}

1462 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (a6dd776) during the generation of this report, so 4135209 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩