Use async_fs file for java and python writes to avoid object_store buffering on local disks #7920
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
✅ 1210 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768] |
134.1 µs | 120.2 µs | +11.57% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768] |
169.9 µs | 141.1 µs | +20.44% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384] |
109.1 µs | 94.8 µs | +15.11% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384] |
144.4 µs | 115.1 µs | +25.43% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768] |
236.7 µs | 178 µs | +32.96% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384] |
148.8 µs | 126.9 µs | +17.29% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/asyncfscreate (214dfb1) with develop (7349cd6)
Footnotes
-
24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩