Skip to content

Use 1024-value pco pages in btrblocks float/integer schemes #7922

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 2 commits into from
+267 −2

Use 1024-value pco pages in btrblocks float/integer schemes

617f690
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Closed

Use 1024-value pco pages in btrblocks float/integer schemes #7922

Use 1024-value pco pages in btrblocks float/integer schemes
617f690
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis succeeded May 14, 2026 in 0s

Performance Gate Passed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
✅ 1210 untouched benchmarks
🆕 10 new benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
🆕 Simulation pcodec_compress_i64_1k_page N/A 9.7 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_compress_i64_default_page N/A 10.6 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_decompress_f64_1k_page N/A 3.2 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_decompress_f64_default_page N/A 2.3 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_compress_f64_1k_page N/A 10.6 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_compress_f64_default_page N/A 11.2 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_scalar_at_i64_default_page N/A 1.4 s N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_scalar_at_f64_1k_page N/A 34.4 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_scalar_at_f64_default_page N/A 1.6 s N/A
🆕 Simulation pcodec_scalar_at_i64_1k_page N/A 32.3 ms N/A
⚡ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768] 134.1 µs 120.2 µs +11.64%
⚡ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768] 169.9 µs 141 µs +20.51%
⚡ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384] 109.1 µs 94.7 µs +15.21%
⚡ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384] 144.4 µs 115.1 µs +25.52%
⚡ Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768] 236.7 µs 177.9 µs +33.03%
⚡ Simulation new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384] 148.8 µs 126.9 µs +17.31%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing claude/pcodec-1k-page-benchmark-mc8sI (617f690) with develop (7349cd6)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ