Skip to content

Add NullCount aggregate function

3fc3da5
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Add NullCount aggregate function #7933

Add NullCount aggregate function
3fc3da5
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed May 14, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -17.06%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1210 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768] 141.2 µs 170.4 µs -17.14%
Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384] 115.2 µs 144.9 µs -20.48%
Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768] 178.1 µs 237.2 µs -24.9%
Simulation new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384] 126.9 µs 149.3 µs -15.04%
Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768] 120.4 µs 134.7 µs -10.57%
Simulation new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384] 94.8 µs 109.5 µs -13.4%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ngates/stats-7707/null-count-stat-wrappers-v2 (3fc3da5) with develop (8c5a0f1)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on develop (a514cef) during the generation of this report, so 8c5a0f1 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.