feat(vortex-geo): per-row bounding-box scalar function (vortex.geo.envelope) by HarukiMoriarty · Pull Request #8831 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Gate Passed

✅ 1835 untouched benchmarks
🆕 12 new benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
🆕	Simulation	`take_chunked_fsl_random[16, 64]`	N/A	353.4 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_chunked_fsl_random[32, 64]`	N/A	520.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_chunked_fsl_random[8, 64]`	N/A	275.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_chunked_fsl_sorted[16, 64]`	N/A	355.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_chunked_fsl_sorted[32, 64]`	N/A	518.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_chunked_fsl_sorted[8, 64]`	N/A	268.8 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_fsl_chunked_elements_random[16, 64]`	N/A	274.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_fsl_chunked_elements_random[32, 64]`	N/A	436.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_fsl_chunked_elements_random[8, 64]`	N/A	197.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_fsl_chunked_elements_sorted[16, 64]`	N/A	268.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_fsl_chunked_elements_sorted[32, 64]`	N/A	432.4 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`take_fsl_chunked_elements_sorted[8, 64]`	N/A	188.1 µs	N/A

_{Comparing nemo/geo-bounding-rect (3879f95) with develop (cbaa3d7)²}

46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (69f5bc5) during the generation of this report, so cbaa3d7 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩