[css-break-3] Add the concept of grouping boxes#12805
Open
[css-break-3] Add the concept of grouping boxes#12805
Conversation
This improves layout in grid containers and tables which contain cells that span across multiple rows which may be broken in separate fragmentainers.
This was referenced Sep 15, 2025
Collaborator
|
I think this is a simpler way of saying the same thing? Or am I missing something? #13810 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This improves layout in tables and grid containers which contain cells that span across multiple rows which may be broken into separate fragmentainers.
Here is an example of what behavior this aims to improve:
This is not meant to be a requirement for UAs, but rather just a suggestion. I hope the use of "should" instead of "must" has that power. (if not, that can be changed)
More context: #12801
I'd be happy to sign the IPR thingy, but I can't seem to do that on my own on the website. (I'm not a member of the working group, nor do I work for a member organization)