minor content corrections

Signed-off-by: Liam Randall <liam@cosmonic.com>

Author: LiamRandall

community/2025-01-15-community-meeting-transcript.mdx

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Yeah, completely. So many things.
 
 **Liam Randall** [28:37](https://youtu.be/1jVV0kPh4wM?t=1717)
 
-Awesome. Moving right along — Mark, I really loved the suggestion to get back to the multi-tenancy support. That was another RFC that got staled out. I think it was a really interesting proposal, but ultimately we didn't have enough evidence around the way we wanted the feature to work, so it felt like a lot to bring on when we didn't know. I've left that one out of this roadmap; feel free to object. I think we'd love to come back to it as soon as we know how we want a multi-tenant host to look. But your other one — a built-in scheduler provider, the cron job provider — I think is a great suggestion. We had an example for this maybe quite a long time ago, and this is something people have been asking for for a little while. It's a pretty common use case. Thank you, Patrick, for filing this issue. This would be a great issue to take on, a great example provider to have, and a great first issue too — it could be done in Rust or in Go fairly well. Aditya, I love that you're interested in taking this one right off the bat. I'm happy to assign this one to you, or, depending on your bandwidth, if you wanted to get started on it, just let me know.
+Awesome. Moving right along — Mark, I really loved the suggestion to get back to the multi-tenancy support. That was another RFC that got staled out. I think it was a really interesting proposal, but ultimately we didn't have enough evidence around the way we wanted the feature to work, so it felt like a lot to bring on when we didn't know. I've left that one out of this roadmap; feel free to object. I think we'd love to come back to it as soon as we know how we want a multi-tenant host to look. But your other one — a built-in scheduler provider, the cron job provider — I think is a great suggestion. We had an example for this maybe quite a long time ago, and this is something people have been asking for a little while. It's a pretty common use case. Thank you, Patrick, for filing this issue. This would be a great issue to take on, a great example provider to have, and a great first issue too — it could be done in Rust or in Go fairly well. Aditya, I love that you're interested in taking this one right off the bat. I'm happy to assign this one to you, or, depending on your bandwidth, if you wanted to get started on it, just let me know.
 
 And then the other one, which I struggled a little to define in a ticket, because some of these are creative work — I love the idea of seeing videos for wasmCloud. I'm not sure if you were asking us to create videos, or if you were suggesting you were going to. Did you want to talk about that at all?
 

community/2025-09-10-community-meeting-transcript.mdx

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Hey folks. This is actually —
 
 **Colin Murphy** [12:12](https://youtu.be/BtOseiHpgmk?t=732)
 
-This is just a Colin Murphy bitching session.
+This is just a Colin Murphy b\*\*\*\*ing session.
 
 **Brooks Townsend** [12:18](https://youtu.be/BtOseiHpgmk?t=738)
 
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ So it's good that you can do a plugin, but not for this kind of stuff, because p
 
 **Brooks Townsend** [14:51](https://youtu.be/BtOseiHpgmk?t=891)
 
-I know, yeah. That's like — there was that really small thing when I was trying to… hey, Victor, we're post-call now. We're in the Colin Murphy bitching session.
+I know, yeah. That's like — there was that really small thing when I was trying to… hey, Victor, we're post-call now. We're in the Colin Murphy b\*\*\*\*ing session.
 
 **Colin Murphy** [15:05](https://youtu.be/BtOseiHpgmk?t=905)
 
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ That's fair. This is really why I was encouraging you the other day to go chat w
 
 **Colin Murphy** [18:21](https://youtu.be/BtOseiHpgmk?t=1101)
 
-I'm looking forward to seeing 0.3 — to see if it actually does all the things. Because we've been saying a lot of "once we have 0.3 this will be easy," especially around mio and Tokio and so many things. WASI crypto, everything that people have been asking for for many years — "oh, well, once we have futures and async, that'll be easy to do." Well, the proof's in the pudding.
+I'm looking forward to seeing 0.3 — to see if it actually does all the things. Because we've been saying a lot of "once we have 0.3 this will be easy," especially around mio and Tokio and so many things. WASI crypto, everything that people have been asking for many years — "oh, well, once we have futures and async, that'll be easy to do." Well, the proof's in the pudding.
 
 **Brooks Townsend** [19:01](https://youtu.be/BtOseiHpgmk?t=1141)