Skip to content

chore: update simd-json and value-trait#14828

Draft
intellild wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/update-simd-json-value-trait
Draft

chore: update simd-json and value-trait#14828
intellild wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/update-simd-json-value-trait

Conversation

@intellild

@intellild intellild commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Update simd-json from 0.17.0 to 0.17.3.
  • Update value-trait from 0.12.1 to 0.12.2.

Closes #14701

Validation

  • cargo check --workspace --locked

by OpenAI Codex

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📦 Binary Size-limit

Comparing bb81406 to refactor(core): improve referenced export data struct (#14796) by Cong-Cong Pan

🎉 Size decreased by 4.00KB from 66.59MB to 66.59MB (⬇️0.01%)

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rsdoctor Bundle Diff Analysis

Found 5 projects in monorepo, 0 projects with changes.

📊 Quick Summary
Project Total Size Gzip Size Change Gzip Change
popular-libs 1.7 MB 551.8 KB 0 0
react-1k 823.1 KB 217.0 KB 0 0
react-10k 5.6 MB 1.3 MB 0 0
react-5k 2.7 MB 663.8 KB 0 0
ui-components 4.9 MB 1.4 MB 0 0

Generated by Rsdoctor GitHub Action

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging this PR will improve performance by 32.87%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 42 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 47 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation sources@parse_source_map_from_json 9.9 ms 7.5 ms +32.87%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing codex/update-simd-json-value-trait (bb81406) with main (25274d8)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 47 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: CSS extract build fails on Linux runners with duplicated build-time module ids

1 participant