RFC 238: Websocket over HTTP/3 test server#238
Conversation
gsnedders
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Especially given this doesn't actually add any new dependencies, and when this shouldn't be a significant amount of code, I'm not even sure this is really RFC worthy.
Experimental CL for reference which is following this doc changes: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7835151
I do think it might be worthwhile going through the review within the WPT project, rather than doing it in Chromium and relying on upstreaming, because I think the interesting questions are really all specific implementation ones?
|
|
||
| `wptrunner` should recognize `h3` tests but keep them disabled unless H3 support is explicitly enabled, for example with `--enable-h3`. When enabled, `wptrunner` includes those tests, and `wptserve` launches and monitors the WebSocket over HTTP/3 server. | ||
|
|
||
| Chromium should use the configured H3 port and force QUIC for that origin. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think how Chromium should be configured it really a relevant part of the question from a WPT point of view, unless it's something particularly complex?
|
|
||
| The main risks are the extra opt-in daemon, the adapter between asynchronous HTTP/3 streams and pywebsocket3's synchronous handler API, and keeping static-resource behavior aligned with `wptserve`. | ||
|
|
||
| The Web Networking and Ecosystem Infra owners should maintain the integration point and server behavior. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Most of the actual WPT tooling is maintained, in principle, by WPT organisationally — knowing there are people willing to help is significant, but not a major point.
And also: this should be clear that these are Chromium teams.
2 participants
Hi web-platform-tests,
We propose introducing a new test server for WebSocket over HTTP/3 to enable writing corresponding WPTs.
Preview version
Experimental CL for reference which is following this doc changes: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7835151
FYI
@bashi , @ricea, @nidhijaju