feat: add debug CRL refresh controls [WPB-24945]

[Garzas]

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-24945

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

Adds a private debug setting for testing E2EI CRL revocation updates faster than the normal CRL expiry cycle.

QA needs a way to force CRLs to expire quickly so revoked certificates can be detected without waiting up to 24 hours.

Causes (Optional)

The existing CRL revocation check button could trigger a manual check, but there was no working debug control that kept CRL expiry short for repeated testing.

Solutions

Adds a Force CRL expiry after 1 minute switch in private debug tools.

When enabled, the app:

• enables the debug CRL expiry override
• immediately triggers a forced CRL check
• reduces the foreground CRL check throttle from 60 minutes to 1 minute while the switch is enabled

When disabled, the app stops using the debug expiry behavior and returns to the normal CRL expiry flow.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

@Garzas looks like you are rolling back kalium to a previous commitish.

This means that the PR's target branch (develop) is using a newer version of Kalium, and the changes in this PR will rollback Kalium to an older version.

develop	This PR
122f2bd1c5e31459d5d090aeeee0a808064a5ef1	d62cb852afb2815902e1d61041d884c561e5f286

Is this intentional?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.95238% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 51.29%. Comparing base (9341b52) to head (1381efb).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...wire/android/ui/debug/DebugDataOptionsViewModel.kt	81.81%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...otlin/com/wire/android/ui/home/AppSyncViewModel.kt	77.77%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4839      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    51.26%   51.29%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          611      611              
  Lines        21181    21201      +20     
  Branches      3405     3407       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits         10859    10875      +16     
- Misses        9308     9310       +2     
- Partials      1014     1016       +2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...com/wire/android/ui/debug/DebugDataOptionsState.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...wire/android/ui/debug/DebugDataOptionsViewModel.kt	56.28% <81.81%> (+1.49%)	⬆️
...otlin/com/wire/android/ui/home/AppSyncViewModel.kt	76.00% <77.77%> (-0.48%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9341b52...1381efb. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.